![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Alcala wrote:
The difference being the rate at which you ascend from lower altitudes, although the military's 10,000 foot rule seems very conservativ. IIRR, even the FAA allows pilots to fly between 12,500 and 14,000 ft. for 1/2 an hour without O2, and pax can do it indefinitely. Pity the poor fighter pilots in WW1, who used to climb up to 17-20,000 feet without O2 and patrol there for an hour or so in open, unheated cockpits. And suffered massive headaches as a result. Ah, memories come back ... in my old freight dog days I used to fly with an older guy who hated to waste fuel on pressurization while crossing the Rockies in Montana. His only complaint was that he had a hard time keeping his cigarettes lit when the MEA's were in the flight levels. Rick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Nelson 4-Place Oxygen Sportsmen System | Mary Kroening | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | June 18th 04 05:31 PM |
FS: Nelson 4-Person Sportsman Oxygen System | Mary Kroening | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | June 4th 04 05:48 PM |
Securing portable oxygen | dutch | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | February 10th 04 05:30 AM |
Meting with a Lancaster rear gunner | Dave Eadsforth | Military Aviation | 12 | November 22nd 03 08:08 AM |
oxygen sensors for aircraft | Air Methods Corporation | Home Built | 0 | September 21st 03 07:16 PM |