A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F15E's trounced by Eurofighters



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 14th 04, 12:59 AM
Evan Brennan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed Rasimus wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 21:20:02 +0200, "David Nicholls"
wrote:

It may be too long ago to be "relevant" to this discussion but the Fleet Air
Arm, flying Harrier FRS1 in the Falklands some 20 years ago apparently never
got into a "dog fight" after the first day of air-to-air combat. They found
that they were functioning in a classic interceptor role (using subsonic a/c
against M2 Mirages!) and achived a kill ratio of some 20 kills for no losses
to enemy aircraft. It is of note that the combat a/c available to the
Argentinians outnumbered the carrier based Harriers by over 10:1. (The AIM9L
was a great leveller of the playing field)


Your final parenthetical says it all. The all-aspect AIM-9L handles
the differential in performance that occurs if you allow the enemy
aircraft to get to the merge.



The boffins at Eglin Air Force Base agreed with Rasimus and Nicholls.

The Argentine pilots used an early version of the Matra 530 that
suffered from a narrow field of vision (30-40 degrees) and a smaller
range of sensitivity to heat.

The British Sea Harrier pilots carried the US-made AIM-9L which had a
90-120 degree field of vision, with a more sensitive seeker that could
detect heat created by airflow from the target. The wider scan and
increased sensitivity of the AIM-9L was obviously a big advantage for
the British because it gave them more flexibility, regardless of
whether they attacked from the rear or front.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about the Eurofighter's air intakes. Urban Fredriksson Military Aviation 0 January 30th 04 04:18 PM
China to buy Eurofighters? phil hunt Military Aviation 90 December 29th 03 05:16 PM
Malaysian MiG-29s got trounced by RN Sea Harrier F/A2s in Exercise Flying Fish KDR Military Aviation 29 October 7th 03 06:30 PM
Impact of Eurofighters in the Middle East Quant Military Aviation 164 October 4th 03 04:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.