![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
In Europe standard practice is to teach fully held off landings, touching down just a fraction over stall speed in a 2 point attitude. Do the incidents referred to result from teaching a 'flown on' landing?
The fully held off approach results in far less energy to do damage if you hit a bump in an off field landing, or to generate a bounce. My flight manuals recommend it. I think there is debate about which technique involves greater risk of a PIO. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stability variation | WingFlaps | Piloting | 2 | April 28th 08 04:45 AM |
| Towing stability studies | Dan G | Soaring | 27 | February 21st 08 09:38 PM |
| Tow vehicle -- electronic stability control | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 4 | June 8th 06 01:31 PM |
| Atmospheric stability and lapse rate | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 39 | February 11th 05 06:34 AM |
| Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 04:22 AM |