![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our glider has two max takeoff weights, one with water ballast and one with only pilot (134 lb difference). I just weighed the glider and the empty weight subtracted from the max takeoff weight (no water ballast) limits the useful load to 225. There's still some room to play with for the forward CG limit but it's the max weight with no water ballast that caps the pilot weight at 225. If the empty weight was lower and the CG was still within the limits, the glider manual references a max pilot weight of 245. Why is the glider legal with increased water weight but not increased pilot weight (assuming CG is still within limits)? I could see the rationale for an increased water weight gross if there was a requirement to jettison the water for landing but I could find no such restriction. So as far as I could tell, you're legal landing with water at a higher weight but not if the extra weight is pilot body mass.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should a W&B list gross weight? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 24 | October 21st 05 11:03 PM |
Gross Weight | Fred Choate | Piloting | 153 | July 14th 05 12:19 AM |
Redline (inspired by Gross Weight) | Jose | Piloting | 10 | July 10th 05 06:35 PM |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |