![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message
... (snip) LOL.... nobody is saying that the Leo's are bad tanks. I haven't heard one person say that at all. They are fine tanks. German's are great (if somewhat overzealous) engineers. What we are saying, however, is that the Leo's are totally unproven in combat, and that all final judgements regarding any weapons system is contingent upon actual combat experience. The M1 series has plenty of combat time under it's belt, and has performed, by all measures, splendidly. It is a combat proven system and is a better tank than the Leopard. It has better armor, excellent targeting systems, and it fires a better round. Period. You need to get over it. As for it being 'Europe's premere MBT', what do you expect? It is probably better than the LeClerc (another parade ground princess), and pigs will fly before the protectionist European governments buy big-ticket items from the USA (and they don't need to; their domestic defense industries are adequate), but you have to understand that the military just isn't a priority there in Europe. The military is in fact on the bottom of their list. So you cannot expect a nation which takes a 'military-last' attitude to produce equipment superior to the USA, which actually may need to use the stuff at some point. Challenger II? And anyone who says Russian tanks are garbage outta have his ass shipped out in an M-1A2 and land on the outskirts of Moscow in 50 degree below zero weather with Mils, Migs, and Sukhois flying about and Russian troops armed with ATGWs. One tank against the entire russian armed forces? Sure, what the hell.... But seriously, you are just being an idiot now (moreso). The scenario you just described is pretty much EXACTLY what the M1 tank was designed for. And you are also assuming that we would not have achieved air superiority before sending our armor in; which we would havem being that it is the US tactical doctorine to only send in ground forces after the air is secured. And the only bigger joke than the Russian army is the Russian air force (well maybe it's tied with their navy). We don't fight wars with just tanks. No takers?... didn't think so since the M-1A2 is confined to attacking puny nations with poor import stripped armor of the FSU crewed by sand-dwelling conscripts. LOL... 'confined'... whatever you say. And I'm not so sure that the modern Russian tank crews are any better trained than the Iraqi's were. Our armed forces are a total and complete overmatch for any other armed force on the globe. Period. It's not even close. Yeah, you are certainly doing a good job in Iraq just now. ![]() Tanks and all. John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some new photos of the 2003 Tiger Meet (Cambrai) | Franck | Military Aviation | 0 | January 2nd 04 10:55 PM |
Airman tells of grandfather's Flying Tiger days | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 11th 03 04:55 AM |
1979 Tiger for Sale | Flynn | Aviation Marketplace | 65 | September 11th 03 08:06 PM |
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 131 | September 7th 03 09:02 PM |