![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m... In article , (B2431) wrote: From: Chad Irby Date: 5/7/2004 6:36 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: In article , (robert arndt) wrote: http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz5.htm Better than any mass-produced piece-of-**** Sherman (except the Firefly British conversion). ...as long as you didn't mind that it had to pretty much sit there and not go very far, due to high ground pressure and very high fuel consumption (a King Tiger in mud became a landmark). Add in the very high maintenance problems, and you had a really tough, sorta-mobile fortress. The Allies did the obvious and ran around the KTs, destroying their support structure, then captured and destroyed a lot of them after they ran out of gas. Definitely follows on the German habit in WWII of coming up with a really cool design that turned out to be a problem to build and support. Did you happen to notice the article teuton offered as proof of what a wonder weapon King Tiger was actually describes what a flop it really was? Yeah, but I've known about the weaknesses of the King Tiger since some time in the early 1970s, when I started getting interested in WWII. You might note that the problems with the King Tiger were mirrored quite often with most of the things the Germans tried to build in the 1940-45 time period. Too expensive, hard to maintain, and used up too much time and resources that they needed in other places. A lot of the Ballantine War Books covered the problems the Germans had with overengineering their machines. The Maus was one of my favorites (the coaxial 128mm and 75mm guns were a bit much, not to mention the 188 tons of weight in the damned thing. Then there was the seldom-mentioned Krupp P1000 Rat. One THOUSAND tons. Two 280mm main guns. Or the P1500 variant with an 800mm mortar(!) and a couple of 150mm cannons... (I still have trouble believing that they were really thinking of building something like this, even early in the war). http://www.achtungpanzer.com/p1000.htm I wonder what the rough field performance was? Max speed for mobile warfare? -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some new photos of the 2003 Tiger Meet (Cambrai) | Franck | Military Aviation | 0 | January 2nd 04 10:55 PM |
Airman tells of grandfather's Flying Tiger days | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 11th 03 04:55 AM |
1979 Tiger for Sale | Flynn | Aviation Marketplace | 65 | September 11th 03 08:06 PM |
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 131 | September 7th 03 09:02 PM |