![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... Dear Dudley, I notice that you only reply to the few parts of messages of which you FEEL to have the right on your side. Any other parts of the message you just leave unanswered. To me it is clear that you are only shouting your opinion, and are not ready to discuss the arguments that are put forward by anybody. I call that ignorant. I believe I've made my point about both you and your site quite clear. I've freely engaged all comers on the issues both pro and con as they have come up. As for avoiding dialog, I'll be happy to engage you on any comment you wish to make. Go on; make your case! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All right, I'll put it to you as straight forward as possible:
How can you be a demonstration pilot and object to people shooting and shearing photos and videos of your actions, even if these include ultimate ****-ups resulting in many casualties ? I'm very curious about your reply ! Iwan "Dudley Henriques" schreef in bericht ink.net... "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... Dear Dudley, I notice that you only reply to the few parts of messages of which you FEEL to have the right on your side. Any other parts of the message you just leave unanswered. To me it is clear that you are only shouting your opinion, and are not ready to discuss the arguments that are put forward by anybody. I call that ignorant. I believe I've made my point about both you and your site quite clear. I've freely engaged all comers on the issues both pro and con as they have come up. As for avoiding dialog, I'll be happy to engage you on any comment you wish to make. Go on; make your case! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... All right, I'll put it to you as straight forward as possible: How can you be a demonstration pilot and object to people shooting and shearing photos and videos of your actions, even if these include ultimate ****-ups resulting in many casualties ? I'm very curious about your reply ! Iwan In the demonstration community we have no objection whatsoever to crash video being used for the purpose of crash investigation or news reporting. These things relate directly to the issues of flight safety. Where on earth did you get the idea we objected to video being used in this manner...surely not from me. I've stated this quite clearly in prior posts. As for the "****ups"; yes, they happen unfortunately, and when they do, it's good to have a filmed record of the event.... which equates completely with my above comment. In fact, we in the community encourage filming of events for just this purpose. The photographers that take these pictures however, don't push them on the net as you are doing, as entertainment, with no news value or safety connection associated with that effort. Next! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well Dudley,
In that case you could have simply written: "I hate it when people spread aviation crash videos for other purpose than aviation safety issues". It would have saved you a lot of unnecessary discussion. As you will have understood, I see things a little differently. Having witnessed a major aircraft crash in which 70 people got killed because a demonstration pilot misjudged the situation, I use it for other purposes. I hope more people are willing to share their crash video footage with me, and I will continue to share it with other people via my website. Furthermore I will keep announcing the video wepage at the newsgroups where people might have an extra interest in viewing my videos. That would best serve my personal purpose. People can download the videos at http://www.dappa.nl-crash.htm and use it for safety issues, viewing pleasure, collecting purposes or whatever other goal they have. I won't judge them for the reason they look at it. Iwan "Dudley Henriques" schreef in bericht ink.net... "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... All right, I'll put it to you as straight forward as possible: How can you be a demonstration pilot and object to people shooting and shearing photos and videos of your actions, even if these include ultimate ****-ups resulting in many casualties ? I'm very curious about your reply ! Iwan In the demonstration community we have no objection whatsoever to crash video being used for the purpose of crash investigation or news reporting. These things relate directly to the issues of flight safety. Where on earth did you get the idea we objected to video being used in this manner...surely not from me. I've stated this quite clearly in prior posts. As for the "****ups"; yes, they happen unfortunately, and when they do, it's good to have a filmed record of the event.... which equates completely with my above comment. In fact, we in the community encourage filming of events for just this purpose. The photographers that take these pictures however, don't push them on the net as you are doing, as entertainment, with no news value or safety connection associated with that effort. Next! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Iwan Bogels wrote:
People can download the videos at LOL! Dead link... -- Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, not 20 seconds ago.....presh "refresh" , because you might have the
old link in your cash.... :-) Iwan "Peter R." schreef in bericht ... Iwan Bogels wrote: People can download the videos at LOL! Dead link... -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... Well, not 20 seconds ago.....presh "refresh" , because you might have the old link in your cash.... :-) Iwan Dead link for me too. Keith ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... Well Dudley, In that case you could have simply written: "I hate it when people spread aviation crash videos for other purpose than aviation safety issues". It would have saved you a lot of unnecessary discussion. I don't believe you quite understand what's been happening here. I have absolutely no problem at all with people downloading to their heart's content from your site and viewing all the crash footage they can cram onto their computers. I merely saw what you are doing and posted a simple one line statement that expressed my personal feelings for both you and what you do. To reiterate, that statement was "I detest people like you". Everything that has transpired since then is simply the usual result on Usenet of people reading a comment like that and one by one, checking in with totally irrelevant comment. I say irrelevant because what they have to say is related to THEM, not to me. I took the trouble to engage the posters I wished to engage dealing with the reasons I had personally for "detesting you". This wasn't done to change anything, or even change anyone's opinions; simply to expand for clarity on MY feelings for what you do. I'm a slightly different poster than the usual you will find on Usenet because when I post, I'm not looking for agreement. Agreement isn't important to me when it comes to Usenet. I post what pleases me. If someone gains from what I say, that's fine. If they hate my guts and want me dead, that's fine too. Couldn't care less either way. So you see, all this fuss about crash video being good or bad is of no consequence to me personally at all. I could care less who watches crash videos and who photographs it and why. By all means, push your video and enjoy your hobby. It's quite humorous to me that this thread demonstrates in exact clarity the total reality of Usenet. You posted for your site......I posted that I detest people like you (note that this statement doesn't even address the "why" question or the video question)......then come the masses to opine with their own "opinions" on the matter, none of which by definition can address why I detest you, which is really funny to me........finally here we are again, after all this expended bandwidth, right back at the beginning. You have your site. They have their opinions. I still detest you. Nothing solved. Welcome to Usenet! :-) As you will have understood, I see things a little differently. Having witnessed a major aircraft crash in which 70 people got killed because a demonstration pilot misjudged the situation, I use it for other purposes. Bull****! You make no mention anywhere on your site of being even remotely interested in the safety issues involved with our work but as I've said, I'm not trying to change what you do. I simply detest what you do. I hope more people are willing to share their crash video footage with me, and I will continue to share it with other people via my website. Furthermore I will keep announcing the video wepage at the newsgroups where people might have an extra interest in viewing my videos. That would best serve my personal purpose. I'm sure you will, as I'm sure there will be no end of people who will make your efforts worthwhile. No problem with me at all Iwan. Go for it. People can download the videos at http://www.dappa.nl-crash.htm and use it for safety issues, I'm sorry, but just the video alone without a corresponding report does little to serve the safety issue. To serve the safety issue, video must be viewed in an investigative context by people who know how to evaluate that video. Putting crash video on the net for viewing by the general public with no expert comment directed at the safety issues involved with the crash does little but allow an uneducated replay of the crash. If you are indeed interested in flight safety, I would expect that the video from every crash you have ever shot had been turned over to crash investigation immediately after the crash, or at least a copy made and distributed immediately to proper investigative authority. When you can show me that this has been done by you, I'll consider not "detesting" you all that much. Until that point, you don't fit any description of a photographer interested in flight safety at all. You're just one more web site junkie pushing your wares to enhance your own image as a photographer. viewing pleasure, collecting purposes or whatever other goal they have. I won't judge them for the reason they look at it. I'm sure you won't, and I won't either. What people do is their own business, even you Iwan. I just happen to detest you that's all; no big deal....never was!! :-) If this thread had any purpose at all, it has served to enlighten a few to how we in the airshow community view the issue of crash video. For some, that will have been interesting. For the rest, who cares. Surely not me. I learned a long time ago that the way to change the world was DEFINITELY not on Usenet! Enjoy! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry, but just the video alone without a corresponding report does
little to serve the safety issue. To serve the safety issue, video must be viewed in an investigative context by people who know how to evaluate that video. This is an excellent point, Dudley, and I would like to propose an idea that could help all pilots, AND improve the utility of my website. As I'm sure you are aware, I, too, have an aviation video page on our hotel's website. (See it at http://www.alexisparkinn.com/aviation_videos.htm ) It is chock-full of fascinating aviation videos, some that are just plain cool, some that show landing in Iowa City for potential guests -- and others that depict terrible crash footage. In some cases I have included commentary from people who were actually involved in the situations depicted. (The B-52 crash, for example.) With most, however, I have no way to identify the people and pilots involved, since most of the videos have been sent to me by fellow pilots from all over the world. You are an aviation expert with a unique expertise in aviation safety. You are also obviously incensed at the notion of aviation crash videos being viewed outside of the aviation safety context. As I've read your posts, I've come around to see that there is much truth in your convictions. I, on the other hand, am interested in maintaining (and expanding) a very popular page on our website, not because it nets me any money (it does not) but because I personally find these videos to be fascinating. Perhaps we can meld the two together? How would you like to provide a short commentary on each crash video, for inclusion on our website? Perhaps a paragraph or two, with your expert opinion on what happened, how the incident could have been prevented, what steps have been taken since the accident to prevent a recurrence, etc., etc. Really, you would have carte blanche to write whatever you felt was appropriate, as a service to your fellow (and future) pilots. What do you say? Want to help fix the problem? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Videos of aviation mishaps, accidents and crashes on-line | Rich | Home Built | 0 | September 7th 04 03:28 AM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
New Aviation Videos and a Rogue's Gallery Update! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 3 | December 28th 03 04:49 AM |
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 2 | October 21st 03 09:27 PM |