![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have contemplated something similar.
I think you would be best to wind the tubes using a carbon / glass tow material and epoxy around a mandrell. Tow would be a lot cheaper then wrapping the tubes in cloth and would allow the properties of the tube to be optimised by changing the winding angle. Pro's and Con's .... It is going to cost more than alumnium. Might save a little weight. Joints will be hard to make at intersections of tubes. The composite tubes will lake the ductility of the alumnium tubes and hence crashworthiness will be compromised. wrote in message ups.com... Robert Dorsey wrote: I took a composite stress analysis mechanical engineering class at a major university (the only class offered). We didn't use any textbook, but used a series of pdf files. Anything in particular you looking for? On 21 Jan 2005 11:51:18 -0800, wrote: Any recommendations for textbooks addressing designing, especially stress analysis, with composite materials? Mr/Ms Mitchell has posted quite a list of books. My particular interest is in stress analysis so as to be able to compare strength to weight ratios for various choices of materials. In particular I'd like to see if there is any advantage to substituting composite members for wood or metal members in stick and rag designs. For instance, one could use swim noodles wrapped in a hard shell of epoxy filled carbon fiber, glass or kevlar tapes and cloth to make tubular members. -- FF |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() .......... :-)) wrote: I have contemplated something similar. I think you would be best to wind the tubes using a carbon / glass tow material and epoxy around a mandrell. Tow would be a lot cheaper then wrapping the tubes in cloth and would allow the properties of the tube to be optimised by changing the winding angle. Pro's and Con's .... It is going to cost more than alumnium. Might save a little weight. Joints will be hard to make at intersections of tubes. The composite tubes will lake the ductility of the alumnium tubes and hence crashworthiness will be compromised. Wrapping in cloth or tape would be a lot easier and faster if doing the layup by hand. It would also be trivial to orient it so that half the fibers of the cloth or all the fibers of unit-directional tape run the length of the tube to maximise bending strength. Before doing anything of the sort I want to be able to calculate that strength, hence the original question. Joints could be made with tows/cloth/tapes to fabricate saddle-like fittings perhaps in-situ. Crash-worthiness remains an important issue. -- FF |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My two cents: for a reasonably simple structure such as the "carbon
around swim tube" proposed, I think the best approach may be to simply build one or two of them and test it/them to destruction. Compare this against a likewise destructive test of the wood part you're proposing to replace. Allow a generous margin for error -- especially if others are going to be building it from your plans, because there can be a great variance in composite strength depending on the builder's skill and environmental conditions. Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for a two-seater design | Shin Gou | Home Built | 13 | December 21st 04 06:44 AM |
Design Software | Brad Mallard | Home Built | 12 | November 12th 04 09:54 AM |
Aircraft Design 1942 flying boats FA | Sally | Home Built | 0 | August 19th 04 06:49 PM |
amateur design consultant? | Shin Gou | Home Built | 14 | June 30th 04 01:34 AM |
Carbon Spar design and construction workshop | Marske Flying Wings | Home Built | 0 | September 18th 03 05:47 PM |