A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Enlisted pilots



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 3rd 03, 04:05 PM
George Shirley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nope, last name was Culbertson IIRC. After all, it's been more than 40
years. Helluva nice fellow and extremely well educated.

George

John Randolph wrote:
Wouldn't have been Ben Willingham would it?

"George Shirley" wrote in message
...

The NavCad program in the mid-fifties sent a bunch of failed aviators to
the fleet as Airmen Apprentices. Had one working for me in the
maintenance office at VR-1 in 1958. Good guy just couldn't handle flying
worth a hoot. Best educated AA I ever met, went to Berea College in
Kentucky. Ben pulled two years as an AA and got out no ambition to
strike for anything once he failed NavCad.

George

Jake Donovan wrote:
Bill,

They held the LDO until they finished their degree and augmented.


(pilots

were 1312) There is currently still a F14 driver who went thru this

program.
It was also up to each individual to augment so many stayed LDO. A


good

friend of mine "Doc" was an Aviator LDO LCDR and was project manager

for the
JPATS in Corpus for a few years.

By 83-84 it has been officially named NAVCAD again. A few changes in


the

wording here and there but it was basically the same program.

JD

"Bill Kambic" wrote in message
...

"Jake Donovan" wrote in message


This was the NAVCAD Program. Min requirements were 2 years of


college.


You

entered the program at the paygrade of an E4-5 and when you completed

flight

school, you were commissioned. 90% of the commissioned NAVCADs flew


in


the

E2/C2 community. Part of your contract was to complete your degree (4

year)

within the next 6 years after your commissioning.

This was not a new program but a resurrection of an old one, one that

has

been brought up again several times.

I was an instructor at VT-28 from '78-81. IIRC, the first of these


guys

were showing up about the time I left. This program was similar to

NAVCAD
but with a crucial difference: upon commission these guys were NOT
1310/1315 but had a uique LDO designator (I don't remember the number).
They bore all the limitations of an LDO commission. They were

intended to
be "grunt" pilots, doing the shore duty (and some sea duty) jobs that

"real"

aviators did not want to do.

I was unaware of the short life of the program, but this does not

surprise
me. The NAVAIR system is just not set up for "pilot only" officers.

Bill Kambic












 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
DCPilots for Washington, DC area pilots Bill Instrument Flight Rules 3 June 5th 04 12:32 AM
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. Bush Air Home Built 0 May 25th 04 06:18 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.