![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope, last name was Culbertson IIRC. After all, it's been more than 40
years. Helluva nice fellow and extremely well educated. George John Randolph wrote: Wouldn't have been Ben Willingham would it? "George Shirley" wrote in message ... The NavCad program in the mid-fifties sent a bunch of failed aviators to the fleet as Airmen Apprentices. Had one working for me in the maintenance office at VR-1 in 1958. Good guy just couldn't handle flying worth a hoot. Best educated AA I ever met, went to Berea College in Kentucky. Ben pulled two years as an AA and got out no ambition to strike for anything once he failed NavCad. George Jake Donovan wrote: Bill, They held the LDO until they finished their degree and augmented. (pilots were 1312) There is currently still a F14 driver who went thru this program. It was also up to each individual to augment so many stayed LDO. A good friend of mine "Doc" was an Aviator LDO LCDR and was project manager for the JPATS in Corpus for a few years. By 83-84 it has been officially named NAVCAD again. A few changes in the wording here and there but it was basically the same program. JD "Bill Kambic" wrote in message ... "Jake Donovan" wrote in message This was the NAVCAD Program. Min requirements were 2 years of college. You entered the program at the paygrade of an E4-5 and when you completed flight school, you were commissioned. 90% of the commissioned NAVCADs flew in the E2/C2 community. Part of your contract was to complete your degree (4 year) within the next 6 years after your commissioning. This was not a new program but a resurrection of an old one, one that has been brought up again several times. I was an instructor at VT-28 from '78-81. IIRC, the first of these guys were showing up about the time I left. This program was similar to NAVCAD but with a crucial difference: upon commission these guys were NOT 1310/1315 but had a uique LDO designator (I don't remember the number). They bore all the limitations of an LDO commission. They were intended to be "grunt" pilots, doing the shore duty (and some sea duty) jobs that "real" aviators did not want to do. I was unaware of the short life of the program, but this does not surprise me. The NAVAIR system is just not set up for "pilot only" officers. Bill Kambic |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
DCPilots for Washington, DC area pilots | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 5th 04 12:32 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |