![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sparky's got it correct on those two birds (EA-6B Prowler & A-6E Intruder).
I spent about half my career keeping those turds fixed so he could go flying. I QA'd lots of late night "drop checks" at the Rock and afloat making sure those gear doors worked as required. Or generally, is there some reason that some jets are designed with gear doors that stay open, while others have doors that close after the gear are extended? I can't speak for the others, but in the case of the Prowler, I understand it was to address a low speed performance issue (as it was explained to a groundpounder). Is this due to Navy "culture" or somehow related to a safety/reliability issue for carrier-based operation? Actually my gut tells me that due to the very demanding nature of carrier landings (high angle of attack, high rate of descent, critical application of power, etc, etc) I'd say that the pilot must have absolute control of the aircraft and research has shown that closing the gear doors (whenever possible) can contribute to smoother airflow and thus better controllability. What a mouthfull. You got the idea. the Prowler had a provision for the forward gear doors to be opened on deck by the plane captain. Gotta make sure there are no hydraulic leaks before you go off the pointy end there Sparky. We want you all to make it a round trip you know! Interesting looking back for a moment. Larry AECS (AW/SW/MTS) Disabled Combat Veteran USN Retired 20 years of Navy in my rear view mirror and getting further away every day ;-) "Elmshoot" wrote in message ... Elliot, On the A-6 Intruder the forward gear doors stayed open when the gear was down. On the EA-6B the forward gear door was only open while the gear was in transit then it closed. When the gear was extended via the emergency gear extention the forward gear doors stayed open with a note in the Natops manual about added drag from the doors being open and higher fuel burn. The Prowler had better throttle response than the Intruder. However on speed was slightly on the back side of the power curve so the reducton of drag was felt to be warneted. Now before you get your knickers in a twist, the Prowler had a provision for the forward gear doors to be opened on deck by the plane captain. So almost all pictures of the Prowler on deck will show the gear doors open. 1400 hrs in the A-6 and 2200 in the Prowler are my reference for the above. I don't know of and have never heard of any conspierency for some standard configuration for the gear doors. Frankly I have never even though about the question. Sparky In another online forum, it has been claimed that on the F-18, F-14, F-4, and possibly F-8, A-7, A-6, and A-4, all the landing gear doors stay open when the gear are extended. While typically (or at least in most other military jets), some of the landing gear doors open only during extension/retraction, and are closed while the gear are extended. Can anyone comment on the extent to which this is true? If so, there's an obvious pattern of this characteristic appearing in fighter/attack jets which were originally designed for the Navy. Is this due to Navy "culture" or somehow related to a safety/reliability issue for carrier-based operation? Or generally, is there some reason that some jets are designed with gear doors that stay open, while others have doors that close after the gear are extended? (The only reasons I've seen that make sense are simplicity versus air drag and, in some cases, ground clearance.) Many thanks in advance. --Elliot Wilen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Military Aviation | 11 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |