![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:51:13 +0100, "Paul J. Adam"
wrote: In message , Colin Campbell writes On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:43:39 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas wrote: Because, by that time, it may be too late. Under international law, every accused person is entitled to be treated humanely, to be properly advised of any charges against them, to be properly advised of their right to defend themselves. Holding people at Guantanamo doesn't excuse the US from obeying international law. We get away with it only because we're the most powerful nation on earth and no one dares to challenge us. You realize that under international law the US has the right to shoot them out of hand? Chapter and verse, Colin, please. (You're usually very clueful, but the GCs are explicit: even spies may not be shot out of hand, but must be tried first) You are correct. They can be tried - then shot. BTW, are you aware that the rules covering these trials are copied almost verbatim from the rules for US military courts-martial? Apart from issues like secret hearings, strict controls on defence counsel and the absence of defence witnesses? Only specific parts of the hearings will be 'secret.' Those are the parts where "Information whose unauthorized disclosure can be reasonable expected to cause harm to the national defense" I suggest that you actually read the rules instead of somebody's opinions of the rules. Here is a link to the actual text. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2...0020321ord.pdf What rights to the Gitmo prisoners have? See the above link. Please note: we consider them to be criminals - not combatants. Roughly how many of those detainees are there because of information that is currently TOP SECRET US EYES ONLY, out of interest? I don't know - and if I did I would not be able to discuss it with you. FYI, I have talked to people who actually guarded those folks. As a result, I feel that they are too dangerous to ever be let free. Or what we can do is give them their weapons back and turn them loose in your hometown. -- In every generation the world has produced enemies of human freedom. They have attacked America because we are freedom's home and defender. The commitment of our fathers is not the challenge of our time. President George W Bush - Sept 14, 2001 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
YANK CHILD ABUSERS :: another reason to kill americans abroad ??? | suckthis.com | Naval Aviation | 12 | August 7th 03 06:56 AM |
YANK CHILD ABUSERS | TMOliver | Naval Aviation | 19 | July 24th 03 06:59 PM |