|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
August 7th 03, 02:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Jose'- Not as good as the F-16N, but.... these are basic F-16A/B with the
old P&W engine. Pechs would find them a bit "emasculated". BRBR As a guy that flew F-4s and A-4s older than the plane captains that cleaned them...I wouldn't.. Even the F-16A was light years more advanced than the tired block 130 F-14s I flew.... Loved the F-16N tho...but i think the F-16A/B is a tremendous idea for USN adversary...and ya know, the more things change, the more they stay the same...I remember when the F-16Ns went away...and all the BS hoopla by NAVAIRSYSCOM about cracks and such...cuz these F-16s were accepted w/o somebody checking with SYSCOM and their rice bowl..they had a axe to grind until they went away...Never liked 'Duke's folly'... Any idea if there are contract or USN maintenance?? P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode