![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/12/2020 11:53 PM, Matthew Scutter wrote:
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:31:33 PM UTC+10, Eric Greenwell wrote: Once I get to about 40% remaining, I can only get ~15kW instead of 22kW. Around 30% it warns me to reduce power below 8kW to prevent battery damage, but doesn't prevent me from continuing. I need about 3.5kW for level flight and 8kW is a ~200ft/min climb. Haven't discharged past 20% yet but it was still able to achieve 8kW at that level. The default charger is 1200W, so even at 110v 10A should be fine, I also purchased a small 600W 'travel' charger that fits more comfortably in the cockpit with me if I outland at a remote airfield and wanted to recharge overnight, or to tour with. So since the power (and voltage?) decreases as the batteries are partially discharged, when it says XX% remaining, what is it a percentage of? Amp-hours? Energy? Altitude it can climb? And how accurate is that prediction? (As we know it was disastrously wrong in a rooftop in CT.) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 12:02:14 AM UTC+10, Moshe Braner wrote:
On 12/12/2020 11:53 PM, Matthew Scutter wrote: On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:31:33 PM UTC+10, Eric Greenwell wrote: Once I get to about 40% remaining, I can only get ~15kW instead of 22kW.. Around 30% it warns me to reduce power below 8kW to prevent battery damage, but doesn't prevent me from continuing. I need about 3.5kW for level flight and 8kW is a ~200ft/min climb. Haven't discharged past 20% yet but it was still able to achieve 8kW at that level. The default charger is 1200W, so even at 110v 10A should be fine, I also purchased a small 600W 'travel' charger that fits more comfortably in the cockpit with me if I outland at a remote airfield and wanted to recharge overnight, or to tour with. So since the power (and voltage?) decreases as the batteries are partially discharged, when it says XX% remaining, what is it a percentage of? Amp-hours? Energy? Altitude it can climb? And how accurate is that prediction? (As we know it was disastrously wrong in a rooftop in CT.) That glider looked (relatively) intact so I hope the logs from the aircraft will provide some insight when the accident report comes out. 7.2.3 Battery packs available energy and consumption Each of the 10 battery icons on the screen represents 10 % of the total available energy. The number of displayed battery icons represents the remaining energy in the battery. It is calculated by comparing the total theoretical available energy of the battery packs (3,8kWh) with the consumed energy per unit of time. The actual consumed energy depends on power setting and the duration of powered flight. Calculation is quite accurate at lower power settings. At high power settings, voltage drop in the battery packs is larger, and thus usable battery capacity reduced. Because of this reason, a yellow warning message: “Low Voltage! Reduce power!” might appear, even if a few battery icons are still displayed. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:49:43 PM UTC-8, Matthew Scutter wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 12:02:14 AM UTC+10, Moshe Braner wrote: On 12/12/2020 11:53 PM, Matthew Scutter wrote: On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:31:33 PM UTC+10, Eric Greenwell wrote: Once I get to about 40% remaining, I can only get ~15kW instead of 22kW. Around 30% it warns me to reduce power below 8kW to prevent battery damage, but doesn't prevent me from continuing. I need about 3.5kW for level flight and 8kW is a ~200ft/min climb. Haven't discharged past 20% yet but it was still able to achieve 8kW at that level. The default charger is 1200W, so even at 110v 10A should be fine, I also purchased a small 600W 'travel' charger that fits more comfortably in the cockpit with me if I outland at a remote airfield and wanted to recharge overnight, or to tour with. So since the power (and voltage?) decreases as the batteries are partially discharged, when it says XX% remaining, what is it a percentage of? Amp-hours? Energy? Altitude it can climb? And how accurate is that prediction? (As we know it was disastrously wrong in a rooftop in CT.) That glider looked (relatively) intact so I hope the logs from the aircraft will provide some insight when the accident report comes out. 7.2.3 Battery packs available energy and consumption Each of the 10 battery icons on the screen represents 10 % of the total available energy. The number of displayed battery icons represents the remaining energy in the battery. It is calculated by comparing the total theoretical available energy of the battery packs (3,8kWh) with the consumed energy per unit of time. The actual consumed energy depends on power setting and the duration of powered flight. Calculation is quite accurate at lower power settings. At high power settings, voltage drop in the battery packs is larger, and thus usable battery capacity reduced. Because of this reason, a yellow warning message: “Low Voltage! Reduce power!” might appear, even if a few battery icons are still displayed. How far you will need to self-retrieve depends upon the flight, not the glider. A Mini-Lak was the glider involved in the case I cited, and the pilot was attempting a 750k record flight. And the oft-quoted self-retrieve distance is way too optimistic - I would cut it in half, and that might be too generous (having to clear a mountain range, for example). Arguing about the circuit amperage is nit-picking (20A is pretty much standard, but 15A may do as well): you have to have a dedicated circuit is the point. These electric gliders will perform, just realize that the manufacturer's are not giving you the entire picture on their limitations, particularly regarding safety. Tom |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote on 12/11/2020 2:05 PM:
Charles Zabinski wrote on 12/11/2020 1:48 PM: There are 16 Silent 2 Electros in the FAA Registration Data Base.* 3 are for sale and are all low time.* Any thoughts?* Are they uncomfortable, poor penetration, what? Call the owners and talk to them. The Electro owner I know likes to talk about his, but he also flies it a lot. Here is his OLC logbook for the 2020 season: https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3....t=olc&pi=10497 Here's the OLC logbook of another 13.5M/FES glider pilot I know: Phil Rose. He flew seven flights in Ely this year in his miniLak, garnering several state, national, and World records in the process. He might be a good source of information for choosing the miniLak over an Electro. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote on 12/13/2020 8:25 PM:
Eric Greenwell wrote on 12/11/2020 2:05 PM: Charles Zabinski wrote on 12/11/2020 1:48 PM: There are 16 Silent 2 Electros in the FAA Registration Data Base.� 3 are for sale and are all low time.� Any thoughts?� Are they uncomfortable, poor penetration, what? Call the owners and talk to them. The Electro owner I know likes to talk about his, but he also flies it a lot. Here is his OLC logbook for the 2020 season: https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3....t=olc&pi=10497 Here's the OLC logbook of another 13.5M/FES glider pilot I know: Phil Rose. He flew seven flights in Ely this year in his miniLak, garnering several state, national, and World records in the process. He might be a good source of information for choosing the miniLak over an Electro. And the missing link! https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3....t=olc&pi=51117 -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2G wrote on 12/13/2020 4:47 PM:
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:49:43 PM UTC-8, Matthew Scutter wrote: Once I get to about 40% remaining, I can only get ~15kW instead of 22kW. Around 30% it warns me to reduce power below 8kW to prevent battery damage, but doesn't prevent me from continuing. I need about 3.5kW for level flight and 8kW is a ~200ft/min climb. Haven't discharged past 20% yet but it was still able to achieve 8kW at that level. The default charger is 1200W, so even at 110v 10A should be fine, I also purchased a small 600W 'travel' charger that fits more comfortably in the cockpit with me if I outland at a remote airfield and wanted to recharge overnight, or to tour with. So since the power (and voltage?) decreases as the batteries are partially discharged, when it says XX% remaining, what is it a percentage of? Amp-hours? Energy? Altitude it can climb? And how accurate is that prediction? (As we know it was disastrously wrong in a rooftop in CT.) That glider looked (relatively) intact so I hope the logs from the aircraft will provide some insight when the accident report comes out. ..... How far you will need to self-retrieve depends upon the flight, not the glider. A Mini-Lak was the glider involved in the case I cited, and the pilot was attempting a 750k record flight. And the oft-quoted self-retrieve distance is way too optimistic - I would cut it in half, and that might be too generous (having to clear a mountain range, for example). Arguing about the circuit amperage is nit-picking (20A is pretty much standard, but 15A may do as well): you have to have a dedicated circuit is the point. These electric gliders will perform, just realize that the manufacturer's are not giving you the entire picture on their limitations, particularly regarding safety. Why does it have to be a dedicated circuit for a 1200W charger? Especially if it's a 20 amp circuit? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How far you will need to self-retrieve depends upon the flight, not the glider. A Mini-Lak was the glider involved in the case I cited, and the pilot was attempting a 750k record flight. And the oft-quoted self-retrieve distance is way too optimistic - I would cut it in half, and that might be too generous (having to clear a mountain range, for example). Tom Why would you need to clear a mountain range on a self retrieve? Motor to the nearest airport and land. It's stupid to kill yourself trying to get home when a safe landing can be made elsewhere, but then who ever said that glider pilots are "smart", especially those of us with motors or engines? -- Dan 5J |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 8:25:36 PM UTC-8, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Eric Greenwell wrote on 12/11/2020 2:05 PM: Charles Zabinski wrote on 12/11/2020 1:48 PM: There are 16 Silent 2 Electros in the FAA Registration Data Base. 3 are for sale and are all low time. Any thoughts? Are they uncomfortable, poor penetration, what? Call the owners and talk to them. The Electro owner I know likes to talk about his, but he also flies it a lot. Here is his OLC logbook for the 2020 season: https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3....t=olc&pi=10497 Here's the OLC logbook of another 13.5M/FES glider pilot I know: Phil Rose. He flew seven flights in Ely this year in his miniLak, garnering several state, national, and World records in the process. He might be a good source of information for choosing the miniLak over an Electro. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 And he is also the pilot I cited who landed his miniLak out, stating to me that he didn't think he had the battery capacity to do a self-retrieve even though he was quite a bit less than 100k out of Ely. Tom |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 8:20:42 AM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:
How far you will need to self-retrieve depends upon the flight, not the glider. A Mini-Lak was the glider involved in the case I cited, and the pilot was attempting a 750k record flight. And the oft-quoted self-retrieve distance is way too optimistic - I would cut it in half, and that might be too generous (having to clear a mountain range, for example). Tom Why would you need to clear a mountain range on a self retrieve? Motor to the nearest airport and land. It's stupid to kill yourself trying to get home when a safe landing can be made elsewhere, but then who ever said that glider pilots are "smart", especially those of us with motors or engines? -- Dan 5J Because the nearest airport IS on the other side of a mountain range! That is exactly what happened at Ely last summer. Tom |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How far you will need to self-retrieve depends upon the flight, not the
glider. A Mini-Lak was the glider involved in the case I cited, and the pilot was attempting a 750k record flight. And the oft-quoted self-retrieve distance is way too optimistic - I would cut it in half, and that might be too generous (having to clear a mountain range, for example). Why would you need to clear a mountain range on a self retrieve? Motor to the nearest airport and land. It's stupid to kill yourself trying to get home when a safe landing can be made elsewhere, but then who ever said that glider pilots are "smart", especially those of us with motors or engines? Because the nearest airport IS on the other side of a mountain range! That is exactly what happened at Ely last summer. O-o-o-o-kay...to my way of thinking, this is less a " battery/self-retrieving thing" than it is a "Kids, *never* get beyond gliding distance/'known-lift' from a safely-landable option" thing. I knowingly/stupidly did - once - and that was more than enough to cure me forever (even though: 1) I already knew I was being stupid/foolish, and 2) no landout was necessary). And, yes, I'm "thoroughly familiar" with unlandable/western-mountain-y territory. Take foolish risks, expect foolish results... Bob W. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PW-5, 1-26, Alisport Silent and Cherokee drivers - read here | Scott Alexander[_2_] | Soaring | 12 | January 12th 13 04:07 AM |
Silent Wings DVD Now Available | Paul Remde | Soaring | 1 | March 6th 07 10:00 PM |
Alisport Silent gliders | Dave Boulter | Soaring | 3 | August 12th 06 05:16 PM |
Silent wings 1.06 released | Andor Holtsmark | Soaring | 0 | March 25th 06 04:42 PM |
Alisport Silent-IN | willie | Soaring | 1 | August 20th 04 12:40 AM |