![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Leanne" wrote in message
think ya gotta own yer aircraft. I don't think they 'employ' pilots. Not necessarily. Many wings supply aircraft to the squadrons. All pilots are volunteers. In MI when I was in H.S. they had a couple of Aeronca Champs and a 172, donated by folks and maintained by bakes sales, airplane washes, etc. In WI in the mid-'70s we had a 172, DeHaviland Beaver, and one or two others with the maintenance donated by Kearny-Trecker. In both places many members did own their own aircraft and donated a lot of time. Funding may have changed since I gave it up, but the only paid missions were, for SAR, assigned by Scott AFB or by the state for training exercises. My recollection, also. Any othe flying (training/currency) was out of pocket, but was reasonable. Ayup. A good way to get some "free" time was to take the Cadets up on some of the syllabus flights that taught basic pilotage and other nav. skills. Funding for that came from donated funds in both places. The main reason I dropped out was the politics and, as a 30 military year retiree, being treated like a snuffy by former WW II Corporals and Privates wearing LtCol leaves. Ain't it the truth!!!!! And the PAPERWORK! Imagine U.S.A.F. regulations, reports, and general ethos applied to a part time organization with almost no funding. Still, the CAP helped get me through private pilot ground school. In WI it was a way to get some free flight time. And it is a VERY worthwhile organization to help youngsters stay away from some of society's less savory passtimes. And, of course, the Navy Wings got more than a few stares, comments, and inquiries!g Bill Kambic If, by any act, error, or omission, I have, intentionally or unintentionally, displayed any breedist, disciplinist, sexist, racist, culturalist, nationalist, regionalist, localist, ageist, lookist, ableist, sizeist, speciesist, intellectualist, socioeconomicist, ethnocentrist, phallocentrist, heteropatriarchalist, or other violation of the rules of political correctness, known or unknown, I am not sorry and I encourage you to get over it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|