A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

President Bush is doing well.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 21st 04, 07:55 PM
Yofuri
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Krztalizer" wrote in message
...
Woody, by that rationale, we need to sortie our invasion forces

immediately to
attack Iran and North Korea at a minimum. We know they have WMD, we know
they'll use them. Ergo, we go to war immediately, without anyone agreeing

with
us.

No matter how frustrating it is to deal with the UN, we either use them as

the
'oversight committee' for the world, or we take on the role of Big Brother

for
the rest of humanity. Given that we turned out to be wrong in this case,

I
imagine it will only be one or two more such incidents before we have

sanctions
placed upon us, for the very reason that we put them on others.

George Bush declared Saddam would be gone. Two presidential cycles later,

his
son took power and completed his father's tasking; WMD was an excuse to

give
his 'change of regime' plan some validity.

As for the well-known and often mentioned chem attack on the Kurdish

village -
the CIA released information that the chemicals used did not match the
fingerprint of Iraqi stocks, but did match the gas in Iranian inventory.

But
since that CIA report two, three years ago, it seems to have been

forgotten and
Saddam gets the blame. Did he use agents in combat? With surity - but

not in
that case that seems to be ritually used to prove Bush's case against him.

I think if Bush had come right out and said, "This turd needs to get

flushed
but instead of using a flimsy excuse that 80% of the world will not agree

with,
I am going to finish the job my dad started," folks would have had less

trouble
with his decision to unilaterally invade another country.

v/r
Gordon


Isn't it amazing how we ignore/revise history when politically convenient?
The Iraqi Liberation Act passed the House of Representatives by a vote of
360 to 38; the Senate vote was unanimous. Please note the content of the
Act, and, most especially, its date:

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/i...bact103198.pdf

Where are all those big Congressional boosters today? Are they buried in a
trench somewhere above or below the WMD?

Also, the date that the House of Representatives formally commenced
investigation of a potential impeachment may be more than just a
coincidence.

Just a bit of bipartisan musing over a couple of the many "October
Surprises" in our political history...

Rick





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
George W. Bush Abortion Scandal that should have been Psalm 110 Military Aviation 0 August 12th 04 10:40 AM
Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution WalterM140 Military Aviation 20 July 2nd 04 05:09 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 05:26 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 05:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.