![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote:
For example, the POH for most single-engine piston airplanes says to land as quickly as practical after an engine failure. As if you have a choice? But what should you do if you have a partial engine faillure? The correct response as far as I am concerned in my simulator is to immediately climb regardless of any prior ATC clearance or instructions and I would venture to believe that most pilots would agree with this, even though I am aware of no POH which includes this in the published procedure. I'm going to play devil's advocate here, and ask why? The obvious answer is "altitude is your friend", so you want to get as much of it as you can while you still can. And, I certainly agree that in a situation like this, I'll do whatever I think is best and let ATC fend for themselves. But... If there's something mechanically wrong with the engine, might adding power for a climb make things worse? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... If there's something mechanically wrong with the engine, might adding power for a climb make things worse? Yes, I agree, depending on the airplane. I would not add power if a particular airplane's engine-failure checklist left the controls at less than a full-power configuration; in that case, I would simply climb at the maximum possible rate given the engine's performance. In my airplane in particular, the first response to an engine failure is "everything forward" -- partly because the throttle controls a variable speed fuel pump which can fail at low speed only and partly because the mixture controls an altitude-dependent fuel controller that has failures modes with anything other than full rich. These correctable engine failure modes justify "everything forward" for my airplane since the benefits of correcting a partial engine failure usually outweight the risks of converting a partial failure to a full failure. While climbing I would proceed to the nearest airport and circle until I were certain that I were in position for a successful deadstick landing if necessary, and only then would I voluntarily reduce power. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Military Aviation | 11 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |