![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they are easier to damage then there is no sence in buying them but
somthing built with quality. "Peter" wrote in message ... "Paul" wrote I am after a David Clarke Headset but am not sure which one to buy. Get a Bose X ![]() club environment though (easier to damage) Peter. -- Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail. E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y. Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're right, there is no sense in buying them for a club environment,
but for someone that can appreciate a 1000 headset, they're the cat's meow. Remember there are those who have and those who want. Too many times those that want will satisfy themselves by saying the BOSE are not that good, not worth the money, their Lightspeeds, et al, are better but they know the truth. If you can afford them, great. If you can't there are wonderful alternatives out there. On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:09:30 -0700, "MRQB" wrote: If they are easier to damage then there is no sence in buying them but somthing built with quality. "Peter" wrote in message .. . "Paul" wrote I am after a David Clarke Headset but am not sure which one to buy. Get a Bose X ![]() club environment though (easier to damage) Peter. -- Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail. E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y. Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've owned my 15XLs for close to three years now, and haven't had a single
problem. I'll qualify that statement by saying that I *carefully* unplug them and replace them in their carrying bag after each use, and I usually don't leave them in the airplane in the winter, even though it is in a hangar. Also have a pair of the QFR Solos for pax, and have no complaints about them either. Steve DeMoss N16071 KHVC "Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ... All joking aside, the single thread that seems to consistently bind all models of lightspeed is their unreliability. From what I've read (from people who have allegedly owned them) I wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot pole. "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Cockpit, I've read of people who've sent them back a dozen times or more Well, I'd wager you've read about exactly ONE person who's done that. And he's gotten one for free now. You also find one person here who hates his (ex-)Cirrus. This is Usenet... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul wrote: Which David Clarke models offer ANR? http://www.avionicswest.com/davidenr.html George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Firth wrote: A recent review that I read (cant recall where, sorry) gave the Bose a low mark for noise reduction and suggested Sennheisser as the best performing. I have both. Prefer (and wear) the Bose. George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() James Robinson wrote: Our company investigated supplying ENR headsets in a high noise area, but decided not to, since there was no demonstrated value. In short, ENR only works on lower frequencies, and those frequencies typically don't affect hearing as much as higher frequencies. ANR can be designed to work on any frequency. I suggest your company might want to check out the Bose ANR headphones (nonaviation). They seem to block out all frequencies. Great hearing protectors in a noisy environment. George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote:
ANR can be designed to work on any frequency. I suggest your company might want to check out the Bose ANR headphones (nonaviation). They seem to block out all frequencies. Great hearing protectors in a noisy environment. We were told by the manufacturer that they wouldn't make them for higher frequencies, since there was risk of increasing noise levels at certain frequencies. As the wavelengths get shorter, there are problems with resonances within the earcups. As far as headsets for noisy environments, the earcups themselves attenuate higher frequency noises. The idea of ENR is to provide attenuation at the low frequencies the passive earcups won't handle. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve DeMoss" wrote in message
. net... I've owned my 15XLs for close to three years now, and haven't had a single problem. I'll qualify that statement by saying that I *carefully* unplug them and replace them in their carrying bag after each use, and I usually don't leave them in the airplane in the winter, even though it is in a hangar. Also have a pair of the QFR Solos for pax, and have no complaints about them either. Conversely, my DC's that I've had for six years have been dropped, banged around, shoved in my flight bag, left in the car in 105F summers and -15F winters. They've been bashed around on the floor of a banner plane for two seasons, scuffed, scratched and all in all abused in just about every way. They've been snowed on, rained on, had avgas spilled on, dropped in the mud and on concrete. I've wrapped the cord around the headset, and pulled out the plugs by the cord. Not all the time, but more than once. They still work like the day I got them. The only problem I've had was losing my mic muff two years ago. -- Mike |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Man, you find all kinds of people on this thread... ![]() I've had a DC 13.4 for lessee, about nine years now. Still works, no problems, comfortable for the most part, even on long five to six hour legs. I don't smash it up as much as Mike does, but do stuff it in my flight bag, wrap the cords around it, and- one of my ways of keeping entertained while instructing- play "yoke toss" with it once in a while. While my student is preflighting, they often leave the door open on the Pipers we fly. I'll stroll over to the right side, and standing just behind the trailing edge, toss my headset through the open door, with the intention of hooking it on the right yoke. Most of the time it misses and either lands on the seat or (more often) crashes to the floor. But you should see the reactions when I do get it on the yoke. "Woah!" Just like at a carnival... g I have seen plenty of students with DC H10-30s, which are a little cheaper. Some have had problems with these. Minor annoyances are the screws on the boom mike loosening, causing the mike to swing freely downward. Can be easily tightened with a small screwdriver, but how often do you have one of these at the start of a flight? Also, I've found I like the mike on the H10-13.4's better, it provides noticibly clearer transmissions. In regards to the ANR issue...Well, an ANR headset is on my list of "get eventually" things, but not a big priority yet. I've had a chance to try a number of ANR's out there, but I'll admit I haven't studied them that closely. Main reason I've waited was that about two years ago I met a Peltor headset technician in the exhibitor area at Oshkosh. I was in the market for an ANR, and she actually discouraged me from getting one. Her explanation was that ANR's work best for people with generally quiet aircraft that have a dull low noise level that causes fatigue. She indicated that ANR headsets attenuate low frequency noise well, which is what causes that fatigue over time; but for the types of noisy general aviation aircraft that I teach in, it would be a better value to have a good passive headset, which works better on the high frequency noise that causes hearing damage. Just having an ANR that "sounds really quiet" wasn't necessarily an indication of good overall hearing protection. Hey Mike, I don't suppose you dunked your headset in the inter-coastal waterway too, huh? -Eric "Mike O'Malley" wrote in message ... Conversely, my DC's that I've had for six years have been dropped, banged around, shoved in my flight bag, left in the car in 105F summers and -15F winters. They've been bashed around on the floor of a banner plane for two seasons, scuffed, scratched and all in all abused in just about every way. They've been snowed on, rained on, had avgas spilled on, dropped in the mud and on concrete. I've wrapped the cord around the headset, and pulled out the plugs by the cord. Not all the time, but more than once. They still work like the day I got them. The only problem I've had was losing my mic muff two years ago. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"skyliner" wrote in
news:fKIgc.162440$w54.1106922@attbi_s01: I've had a DC 13.4 for lessee, about nine years now. Still works, no problems, comfortable for the most part, even on long five to six hour legs. I don't smash it up as much as Mike does, but do stuff it in my flight bag, wrap the cords around it, and- one of my ways of keeping entertained while instructing- play "yoke toss" with it once in a while. I've had about the same experience with DC. I bought a set of H10-80 several years ago when I was looking for two things. (1) A bulletproof headset that could take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. (2) The best passive noise reduction that was available at the time. Since then, I've had an aftermarket ANR Kit installed and I haven't found another headset with better noise reduction. -- John Godwin Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT from email address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
David clark headsets wanted | OSKI 3 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 26th 04 02:44 PM |
FS: David Clark H10-60 | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 12th 04 02:17 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
David Cark for sale | Eskil | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 14th 03 01:54 PM |