![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
can someone briefly show the difference between EMI, EMC tests?
-- Fritz |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Fritz
writes can someone briefly show the difference between EMI, EMC tests? Simple definitions: ElectroMagnetic Interference (EMI) = How much (quantity) EMI does the item under test generate. ElectroMagnetic Compatibility (EMC) = How susceptible to interference is the item under test. Example 1: A radio transmitter may have good EMC properties (i.e. It is not generally susceptible to interference from other sources) but it generates a lot of EMI - radio waves; (but that's what it is meant to do). OK, this is a bit of a special case. Example 2: A GPS receiver is listening for very low level radio signals disguised as noise. It needs to have good EMC properties (i.e. it is not very susceptible) to allow it to work as intended. It might generate (from its own internal circuits) some small amount of EMI which could effect itself or other equipment nearby. Hence most EMC tests have a distance in the test results, the "safe distance" it can be placed next to another item. This "safe distance" can be difficult to understand. However, if you look at the compass and note the reading, then put your headset next to the compass it will give a different reading. Now slowly move the headset away from the compass until the compass reading is back to normal. Measure the distance from the headset to the compass and you have the "compass safe" distance for that particular headset/compass combination. This is the magnetic wave safe distance. In electronics, we use electromagnetic waves (generated by electricity, not natural magnetic waves), but the same principle applies. Hope that helps -- Alan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan wrote:
Hope that helps Clear! -- Fritz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military looks to next round of tests for Osprey | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 18th 04 11:01 PM |
Some airmen struggle with new fitness tests, By Charlie Coon, Stars and Stripes | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | April 11th 04 10:59 PM |
Key tests for new jet set for April | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 11:12 PM |
Ground tests & pilot logbook. | Paul Lee | Home Built | 13 | February 12th 04 03:36 PM |
New way to measure up: Air Force's revamped fitness tests start in January | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 23rd 03 12:21 AM |