![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter" wrote in message ... "Paul Sengupta" wrote So my night flying was legal, in fact it was done fully IFR, mostly in IMC, because I can do that in the UK outside Class A with my night rating and IMC rating. Didn't you do a suitable cross-country for your night rating? Not quite; the FAA night x/c needs to be 100nm total and can be either A-B-A (where A-B is 50nm in a straight line) or A-B (where A-B is 100nm in a straight line). I did do well over 100nm (dual) but not between suitably distant separate locations. It also needs 10 takeoffs and full stop landings all done during official night (called Civil Twilight in the USA). I think for the NR one needs just 5. Not many UK PPLs with the night rating will have done that particular combination as there is no need for it. I know for a fact that some US-based flying schools have accepted a *solo* night x/c flight, but due to lack of time to do this in the USA I am following the much more complicated and expensive UK based route and the few "methods" of doing it here won't accept this ![]() The establishment also refuses to accept any of my current 25 dual instrument hours towards the FAA IR 15-hr dual requirement (which any of the schools in Florida accepts OK) but that's another story... Peter. As I have said before my training for the night qualification done in Naples ensured that I did the necessary take offs and landing and cross country to meet the US requirements but also included the 5 solo take offs and landings required for the night qualification. Total time was 6.5 hrs. As far as the instrument time is concerned, get another training organisation if you can. The IMC rating training time is allowable towards the training requirement for the FAA/IR. The school is trying to stiff you for additional time. In theory you only need three more hours of training being signed off by a FAA CFII. The rest of the instrument time can be done with another PPL acting as your safety pilot whilst you practice approaches etc. The one thing IMC rated pilots seems to excel at despite the limited training we have to do is partial panel flying. My US instructor remarked to me that all his British IMC rated students were far better than average on partial panel. Mind you, most of my 15 hours was done on PP anyway. FWIW, the training done for the IMC renewal was also accepted. At the end of the day, I went to the US with 30 hours on instruments, over half being training for the IMC and the renewals, flew another 25 hours in simulated and actual IMC and passed the checkride. The DPE checked all the numbers with me and he was entirely satisfied. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |