A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Demo Flight Suggestions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 10th 03, 02:56 PM
Ryan Ferguson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Kaplan wrote:

Take the airplane up to an altitude near its service ceiling, practically
speaking about 10,000 or 11,000 feet for a 172. Lots of engine problems
can show up at altitude which are not apparent down low.


Really? Hmm, that's interesting! I've never heard that. What is the reason
for this?


  #2  
Old July 11th 03, 03:40 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ryan Ferguson" wrote in message
...

Really? Hmm, that's interesting! I've never heard that. What is the

reason


For any piston engine (i.e. normally aspirated or turbocharged), if the
engine is not making maximum power for any reason -- weak cylinder,
induction/exhaust system defects, etc. -- this may become most apparent when
you try to climb to altitude and realize the plane does not have the power
to do what the book says it should do. Loss of power is more obvious in
relation to reduced rate of climb than reduced airspeed. There are planes
out there which simply cannot reach their published service ceiling or
maximum authorized operating ceiling, and the easiest way to verify this is
to go up high. Or to put it another way, if an airplane is capable of
reaching its service ceiling then that is one more datapoint suggesting the
engine and induction system are healthy -- consider this "necessary but not
sufficient" to establish the engine's good health.

For a turbocharged airplane (granted only indirectly relevant to this thread
about a C172), a high-altitude test flight is absolutely essential. Since a
turbocharged engine is worked harder/hotter at altitude (basically the
opposite of a normally aspirated engine), a weak turbo can mask a weak
engine down low and a weak engine can mask a weak turbo down low. The only
way to assess maximum performance from both the engine and the turbo is to
do a "critical altitude test" and assess the altitude at which the turbo
reaches its maximum output. There can also be problems with magneto
firing, anaeroid fuel flow controllers, turbo controllers, and induction
leaks which show up only at altitude.


--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com






  #3  
Old July 12th 03, 01:16 PM
Ryan Ferguson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Makes sense. Thanks for the information.

-Ryan

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.