![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Galban wrote:
: "Wayne" wrote in message ... : Just got the original POH, there was no CS prop on the 175 or 175 : Skylark. On my plane the prop knob is in the cig lighter hole. : Really? Sorry about that. I've flown about 4 examples of the 175 : over the years and half were O-360 conversions. I thought they all : had a CS prop. Oh boy. There go the brain cells :-( A guy on my field has a constant-speed prop on his GO-300 powered cessna. It's a Cessna 172 "Powermatic", which is what they called the 175/Skylark after it got it's bad reputation. The CS prop is from the factory, the prop governor is mounted on the back side of the reduction gear housing on top of the engine. Any you guessed it, people wouldn't rev the engine high enough, AND they'd use the prop to decelerate (backdriving the engine), which is a no-no with a geared engine. So, these engines got a bad reputation. -- Aaron Coolidge (N9376J) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah! Found it. The 175C model had the CS prop. Thanks for the tip, the
word Powermatic is what I needed... Wayne Model R172E/H/J: 210HP, 6 Cyl, 100 Oct Continental IO-360-D** Model R172K: 195HP, 6 Cyl, 100 Oct Continental IO-360-K/KB** Military T-41B & D 210HP, 6 Cyl, 100 Oct Continental IO-360-D*** Model 175 C & P172D (Powermatic)175HP, 6 Cyl, 80 Oct Continental GO-300-D* Notes: * Cessna experienced trouble with the geared engines in the model 175 (also known as the Skylark) and, in 1963, changed the designation to P172D (also known as the Powermatic) in an attempt to remove the stigma of the engine. The 175 has always been, basically, a 172 airframe with some changes. The P172D is even more so: it's a straight 172D airframe. For more information, see note 1 below. Comments: 1. The geared Continental engines used in the C175 Skylark and P172D Powermatic have a history of upper-end (cylinder) distress ostensibily caused by the higher RPMs. It is supposedly becoming very difficult to overhaul these engines as parts are in short supply, especially for the gearboxes. Major $$$$$ for gearbox parts. A guy on my field has a constant-speed prop on his GO-300 powered cessna. It's a Cessna 172 "Powermatic", which is what they called the 175/Skylark after it got it's bad reputation. The CS prop is from the factory, the prop governor is mounted on the back side of the reduction gear housing on top of the engine. Any you guessed it, people wouldn't rev the engine high enough, AND they'd use the prop to decelerate (backdriving the engine), which is a no-no with a geared engine. So, these engines got a bad reputation. -- Aaron Coolidge (N9376J) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Phoenix AIM-54A (QUESTION) | Krztalizer | Naval Aviation | 10 | February 23rd 04 07:22 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
T Tail question | Paul Austin | Military Aviation | 7 | September 23rd 03 06:05 PM |