![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Just because I have not heard of it being approved does not mean it isn't. Could very well be. The home builders know WAY more than I do about epoxy fillers (like 100% more than me). Besides, who cares if it is approved or not if it holds up? Sorry for the overly strong reaction. That tank repair will probably outlast the plane.... See Ya, Mike Jay Honeck wrote: You wrench used epoxy-based filler? New one on me. I never knew that was approved for use on fuel tanks. After sanding I'll bet the old fiberglass job looked perfect too! Time will tell. Thanks for the advice on the tanks. I wasn't aware that epoxy-based fillers might not be approved for fuel tanks. I think the reason he used it was that it is so fuel resistant throughout the hardening process. Because of this property, he was able to fill the voids in the fiberglass without having to drain the tanks, which saved significant time and effort. There were no holes that went all the way through to the gasoline compartment itself. Because I caught the problem early, the repairs were considered a cosmetic repair rather than an airworthiness issue -- perhaps that's the difference? Our A&P is an EAA'er from way back (he's built several planes), is a lifetime member (and former Grand Champion winner) of the Antique Aircraft Association in Blakesburg, and a member of that elusive group known as the "Quiet Birdmen". He is also the guy who rebuilt our O-540 last year. To say I trust the guy implicitly would be an understatement -- but now you've got me wondering. I think the reason the fiberglass degraded goes back to a poor job being done five years ago. I spoke with the guy who sold the previous owner the plane (our plane is one of those gems that never seems to leave the airport -- it just gets sold "internally"), and he said the tips were a point of contention at the time of sale, because they had some hangar rash and scratches on them. The seller agreed to re-do them (he owns a body shop), but -- when the buyer removed the tips and tried to have them re-done without any advanced warning -- the seller was unable to get to them right away. (His "Corvette guy" was on vacation, or something...) In a huff, the buyer took them to an out of town body shop, owned by a friend, who did them right away. Apparently the seller didn't think too highly of this shop, or their reputation -- so I guess I can believe trouble was brewing from the get-go. Well, anyhow, next step is paint. We'll see how long it holds up. (At least now it's been done by a guy who will stand behind his work...) __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That tank repair will probably outlast the plane....
I sure hope so! Thanks for the good advice, as always... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 08:40 AM |
Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 205 | July 22nd 04 05:31 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |
Tanks for nothing (repost from Bearhawk list) | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 0 | August 6th 03 03:06 AM |