![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Got a problem here, and I'm wondering if anyone else has run into it before.
Five years ago (or so) the previous owner of our Cherokee 235 repainted the fiberglass wingtip tanks. Apparently he had an automotive body shop do the fiberglass work, and around the filler necks they used a fiberglass that was NOT impervious to gasoline. Thus, the fiberglass resin turned kinda mushy, and little chunks of it started coming out. Paint wouldn't stick to it, and it just generally looked like crap. Eventually it could have become an airworthiness problem, as the filler necks might have come completely out of the fiberglass. My A&P has now dug out all the gooey fiberglass, and replaced it with a gasoline impervious epoxy-based filler. After sanding, it looks PERFECT, and I have just purchased the paint ($80 a PINT for Imron now!) to paint the tops of both tips. Question: In another aviation forum, someone mentioned that the gasoline vapors can actually go THROUGH fiberglass, and get at the underside of the paint. It then works on the paint from the underside, softens it, and the surface starts to break down. If this is true, then what I have done will only solve the problem right around the filler necks. Has anyone ever heard of this? Did I fix the tip of the iceberg here? Is there a better "fix" for the problem than what we're doing? Thanks! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 23-Sep-2003, "Jay Honeck" wrote: Question: In another aviation forum, someone mentioned that the gasoline vapors can actually go THROUGH fiberglass, and get at the underside of the paint. Jay, This sounds like a bit of aviation-style urban legend. If the gasoline molecules could penetrate the fiberglass then the tanks would "seep". It's the same molecules whether in gas (vapor) or liquid state. I think you are OK. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Not sure I have ever heard of fiberglass that was not fuel resistant. Most glass resins I have ever heard of are polyester based and definitely hold up against most fuels (chemists please feel free to chime in). More likely there was a blending/curing problem or they used some old resin that had a contaminant or moisture problem. If the catalyst proportion was too low and/or the temperature during the cure was low, there may have been a very slow cure period. Once fuel or other solvents gets to glass that is not fully cured, it will start to delaminate (as you described). However, even in this case, the mix usually hardens way before you ever gas up since it takes some time to prepare for paint, paint, mount, and then refuel. Most I have seen a bad mix take to cure is 12 hours or so. If it took any longer, one usually starts over and scraps the first attempt. Another possibility is that the tank actually contained fuel during the process. Don't laugh. I have seen similar situations. Fumes from the fuel will disrupt curing and cause all sorts of ills as they get absorbed in the resin. You wrench used epoxy-based filler? New one on me. I never knew that was approved for use on fuel tanks. After sanding I'll bet the old fiberglass job looked perfect too! Time will tell. Mike Jay Honeck wrote: Got a problem here, and I'm wondering if anyone else has run into it before. Five years ago (or so) the previous owner of our Cherokee 235 repainted the fiberglass wingtip tanks. Apparently he had an automotive body shop do the fiberglass work, and around the filler necks they used a fiberglass that was NOT impervious to gasoline. Thus, the fiberglass resin turned kinda mushy, and little chunks of it started coming out. Paint wouldn't stick to it, and it just generally looked like crap. Eventually it could have become an airworthiness problem, as the filler necks might have come completely out of the fiberglass. My A&P has now dug out all the gooey fiberglass, and replaced it with a gasoline impervious epoxy-based filler. After sanding, it looks PERFECT, and I have just purchased the paint ($80 a PINT for Imron now!) to paint the tops of both tips. Question: In another aviation forum, someone mentioned that the gasoline vapors can actually go THROUGH fiberglass, and get at the underside of the paint. It then works on the paint from the underside, softens it, and the surface starts to break down. If this is true, then what I have done will only solve the problem right around the filler necks. Has anyone ever heard of this? Did I fix the tip of the iceberg here? Is there a better "fix" for the problem than what we're doing? Thanks! __________________________________________________ ____________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You wrench used epoxy-based filler? New one on me. I never knew that was
approved for use on fuel tanks. After sanding I'll bet the old fiberglass job looked perfect too! Time will tell. Thanks for the advice on the tanks. I wasn't aware that epoxy-based fillers might not be approved for fuel tanks. I think the reason he used it was that it is so fuel resistant throughout the hardening process. Because of this property, he was able to fill the voids in the fiberglass without having to drain the tanks, which saved significant time and effort. There were no holes that went all the way through to the gasoline compartment itself. Because I caught the problem early, the repairs were considered a cosmetic repair rather than an airworthiness issue -- perhaps that's the difference? Our A&P is an EAA'er from way back (he's built several planes), is a lifetime member (and former Grand Champion winner) of the Antique Aircraft Association in Blakesburg, and a member of that elusive group known as the "Quiet Birdmen". He is also the guy who rebuilt our O-540 last year. To say I trust the guy implicitly would be an understatement -- but now you've got me wondering. I think the reason the fiberglass degraded goes back to a poor job being done five years ago. I spoke with the guy who sold the previous owner the plane (our plane is one of those gems that never seems to leave the airport -- it just gets sold "internally"), and he said the tips were a point of contention at the time of sale, because they had some hangar rash and scratches on them. The seller agreed to re-do them (he owns a body shop), but -- when the buyer removed the tips and tried to have them re-done without any advanced warning -- the seller was unable to get to them right away. (His "Corvette guy" was on vacation, or something...) In a huff, the buyer took them to an out of town body shop, owned by a friend, who did them right away. Apparently the seller didn't think too highly of this shop, or their reputation -- so I guess I can believe trouble was brewing from the get-go. Well, anyhow, next step is paint. We'll see how long it holds up. (At least now it's been done by a guy who will stand behind his work...) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Spera wrote:
Jay, Not sure I have ever heard of fiberglass that was not fuel resistant. Most glass resins I have ever heard of are polyester based and definitely hold up against most fuels (chemists please feel free to chime in). Polyester resin can not be used with fuels. The wing skins of my Aerocomp are made with polyester resin. The wet portions of the wing are exposed to fuel and have to be coverd with fiberglass mat and vinylesther resin. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Spera" wrote in message ... Jay, Not sure I have ever heard of fiberglass that was not fuel resistant. Most glass resins I have ever heard of are polyester based and definitely hold up against most fuels (chemists please feel free to chime in). I('m not a chemist, but there are evidentally some out there. I have a small leak in my tip tank (which itself is metal) but it is disolving the fiberglass fairing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Just because I have not heard of it being approved does not mean it isn't. Could very well be. The home builders know WAY more than I do about epoxy fillers (like 100% more than me). Besides, who cares if it is approved or not if it holds up? Sorry for the overly strong reaction. That tank repair will probably outlast the plane.... See Ya, Mike Jay Honeck wrote: You wrench used epoxy-based filler? New one on me. I never knew that was approved for use on fuel tanks. After sanding I'll bet the old fiberglass job looked perfect too! Time will tell. Thanks for the advice on the tanks. I wasn't aware that epoxy-based fillers might not be approved for fuel tanks. I think the reason he used it was that it is so fuel resistant throughout the hardening process. Because of this property, he was able to fill the voids in the fiberglass without having to drain the tanks, which saved significant time and effort. There were no holes that went all the way through to the gasoline compartment itself. Because I caught the problem early, the repairs were considered a cosmetic repair rather than an airworthiness issue -- perhaps that's the difference? Our A&P is an EAA'er from way back (he's built several planes), is a lifetime member (and former Grand Champion winner) of the Antique Aircraft Association in Blakesburg, and a member of that elusive group known as the "Quiet Birdmen". He is also the guy who rebuilt our O-540 last year. To say I trust the guy implicitly would be an understatement -- but now you've got me wondering. I think the reason the fiberglass degraded goes back to a poor job being done five years ago. I spoke with the guy who sold the previous owner the plane (our plane is one of those gems that never seems to leave the airport -- it just gets sold "internally"), and he said the tips were a point of contention at the time of sale, because they had some hangar rash and scratches on them. The seller agreed to re-do them (he owns a body shop), but -- when the buyer removed the tips and tried to have them re-done without any advanced warning -- the seller was unable to get to them right away. (His "Corvette guy" was on vacation, or something...) In a huff, the buyer took them to an out of town body shop, owned by a friend, who did them right away. Apparently the seller didn't think too highly of this shop, or their reputation -- so I guess I can believe trouble was brewing from the get-go. Well, anyhow, next step is paint. We'll see how long it holds up. (At least now it's been done by a guy who will stand behind his work...) __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That tank repair will probably outlast the plane....
I sure hope so! Thanks for the good advice, as always... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 08:40 AM |
Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 205 | July 22nd 04 05:31 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |
Tanks for nothing (repost from Bearhawk list) | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 0 | August 6th 03 03:06 AM |