![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
david wrote in message ...
I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. Auto pilot broken. What is your long range plan with the plane? Keep it? Sell it? This will determine whether or not this kind of investment is valuable. Although there are exceptions it is usually better to purchase a plane in the condition you want versus buying a fix-it upper and shelling out $10000s in the repair/refinishing process. However, the $25k purchase price makes this worth evaluating. If you completely overhaul the plane and make everything in it new - depending on airframe time, you probably have a market value $100k airplane. Skip a bit here/there and you probably have a $75k airplane, so you have a $50k budget to work with. Start with a few of the basics: What is the airframe time? Are all ADs complied with (should look at the SBs too) - did you have an independent mechanic verify this? It can cost a 1000s if not 10000s to comply with ADs and SBs. Is there damage history to the plane (and is it recent?) - if so this will subtract significantly from the end market value. A cracked cylyinder probably won't cost $5k to repair, but I'm guessing these engines will need more work than the $5k to be/stay airworthy. A safe bet would be to expect a MOH in the near future... Factoryengines.com lists an overhauled IO540 at $22k each. What are the compressions? How long ago was the MOH? How long since the mags were overhauled? How about the ignition wiring and plugs? I think most Lycomings are a 12 year or 2000hr TBO. New paint on a twin will be about $10k. Hopefully they will not find corrosion when the paint is peeled. A nice interior on a twin will be $10k. $5k if you go with fabrics only (no leather) and do not replace the interior plastics. New windows would be $2k installed. Avionics are a wild card and are up to you. You can easily spend $30-40k on a panel. However, for the most bang for the buck, you could add 1 GNS430 for about $10k installed and have IFR certified GPS/VOR/LOC/GS. The plane would probably need a good audio panel/intercom, which would be $3500 installed. Autopilots particularly older ones can be troublesome to repair/maintain - you may want to consider purchasing a new AP. An STEC-30 (altitude hold) autopilot will cost about $10k installed. You could look on Ebay to find a used KX-155 and KI209 as a backup NAV/COM. New gyros might be a consideration, as would be a reconfiguration of the panel to a standard T instrument layout. This would be another $2-3K. Another thing to consider - expect LONG downtimes during your refurbishment. Probably a month (at least) for your major overhauls. A month for the P&I. A month for the avionics and gyro work. Plus a few more months to get various gremlins worked out. That would be a best case... Paying $10k/yr insurance plus hangar, plus cost of capital, plus maintenance bills really sucks when you are not getting to fly. On that note, it might make sense to only use the plane privately for the first year while you are doing the rehab. No sense in paying commercial insurance rates if the plane is going to sit in the maintenance shop. Last, you mentioned an $80/hr operating rate for the Aztec. I assume you mean the fuel only cost. Most light twins cost about 2.5x the hourly fuel cost to operate. Good luck! -Nathan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree completely with your conclusions- a new owner will never recover the
full value of investments in refurbishing a beat airplane, 20-30cents on a dollar may be close. However, your estimates on the cost of repairs seem a bit low. Paint on a twin for $10,000 is kind of a budget job. For that amount of money you can expect the screws and panels to be painted over (not removed prior to paint), as well as no extras like painting the gear legs or wheel wells. Don't be surprised if there are a fair number of paint runs or overspray. A top notch job, with complete body work, stripping, primer, paint, and replacement of all hardware with stainless will run closer to $20,000. A new interior with leather, new carpeting, and a cleanup of the headliner will run more like $15,000. You might do an Airtex home job for around $5,000 if you have the time. New IO-540's will probably be on the order of $30-35,000 each, particularly with new hoses and accessories, unless they're turbocharged, which could go up to around $45,000 each. Don't forget prop overhauls as well. New boots will be around $25,000-30,000 as well. Avionics can be the biggest variable. An autopilot (nearly a necessity for flying a twin in weather) is going to be more like $15-20,000. The S-TEC 30 is a good basic unit (I have one in my single with altitude hold), but may not adequate for a plane flown frequently in IMC. I have experienced most of the above over the last two years that I have owned a B-55, except the engines. Instead of boots, I went with TKS, which provides known icing certification by STC. Unlike boots, there is no maintenance required, and they will not need replacement unless you run the wing into something. New thicker windows were installed by Beryl D'Shannon, and paint was done by Dial Eastern in Ohio. The plane is now at Airmod for a complete leather interior. From personal experience, I will never recover even a small fraction of my investments. This approach is OK if you plan on keeping the plane for a while, but if you want to trade up every few years, a better approach might be to find something that comes closest to meeting your needs at a good price, then selling up when you want more speed or room. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't sound like a good first plane to me. First, you have no idea of
what everything will cost to fix. Second you seem concerned with the cost of the fuel burn, this will turn out to be a trivial expense in the scheme of things. The only way it might make sense is if you NEED a twin, can fly it "as is" (after replacing the cylinder) and plan to sell it in a few years cheap. Mike MU-2 "david" wrote in message ... I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. Auto pilot broken. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? Most of the similar year planes I have seen are about $80,000. My buddy is an avionics repaiman and would thoroughly check the plane prior to the purchase. Could it be resold at a profit if I needed to? Please give any advice as I don't want to make a big mistake. Thanks in advance. David *** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com *** Add a newsgroup interface to your website today. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I never like to rain on someones parade just because they are new to the
game, but this airplane will be trouble... Your initial engine repair estimates are low by a factor of 3X just to get em running properly - and then only for a time, maybe a year or so... You are likely to then find that the engines will both need major overhauls... One already has the sickness, and as soon as you start using them, so will the other... Next, you may find that the props and hubs are out of limits.. Once that little overhaul is done, you will discover that the rpm wobble also involved the prop controllers, for a another thousand bucks or so... You likely will discover that the power pack needs an overhaul, where you will then discover that most of the hydraulic hoses need replacing... Not to mention that you need new seals on the gear cylinders, and that the pivot bushings are shot, causing you to drop the gear - where you will find or break some limit switches and wiring that needs replacing... And, while we are on hoses, how about the fuel lines, hmmm? And, you better get a look at the fuel bladders - probably gonna need some bucks thrown at them.. Now, lets get into the control surfaces... Most likely the pivot bushings are worn and the surfaces are sloppy and will need a rebuild... And, how are the cables and pulleys? And, while we are inside the fuselage how many AD's have not been done, hmmm? Don't tell me about the log book, have the mechanic go look.. There's gonna be some surprises on a ship that was not maintained in the first place Awww riiight, I'm only getting warmed up (I do speak Aztec) but I'm gonna stop beating on you here... I hope you get the picture, and that you get actual, real world, estimates before putting down one penny your paint estimate is out to lunch... If in the end the math adds up for you, then go for it... Me, I would look for a plane that was maintained that is in the $75K - $100K range, that I can fly away - and save myself a lot of grief and dollars in the end.. Denny "david" wrote in message ... I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message ... Next, you may find that the props and hubs are out of limits.. Right, I believe this things has the Hartzell X/V hub props on them. They're probably already unserviceable. Has the first inspection required by the AD from a few years back been done yet? This is done every 250 (or 500 hours). A large number of the props sent to Hartzell for the inspections get defiled by Hartzell as unserviceable. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dennis O'Connor wrote: Next, you may find that the props and hubs are out of limits.. He said it has brand new props. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My initial reaction is first plane? save money? if you have to ask,
don't? Buy it if you WANT a project, otherwise no. It's more difficult to get work done on a plane than you think. Planes consume money, they don't save money. What about the down time while it gets repaired? Usually the running costs of an airplane swamp the purchase costs anyway, so saving money on purchase becomes a moot point. YOu will spend the purchase cost in 500 hours of flight running costs. Saving a little in purchase cost is very minor in the overall long term scheme of things. Planning on scotching on running maintenance too? If you have the money, buy a plane in the absolute BEST running condition with the avionics and options YOU WANT and will be satisfied with. If you want to save a little money, but a hail damaged plane, they fly just fine and are 10k less. Also, if you want to save money, ramp it, not hangar it. Also, if you want to save money, buy liability insurance only and BE CAREFUL. But don't buy a project to save money. They don't. david wrote in message ... I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. Auto pilot broken. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? Most of the similar year planes I have seen are about $80,000. My buddy is an avionics repaiman and would thoroughly check the plane prior to the purchase. Could it be resold at a profit if I needed to? Please give any advice as I don't want to make a big mistake. Thanks in advance. David *** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com *** Add a newsgroup interface to your website today. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() david wrote: I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) $15K times two, as surely the other one is worthless. Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) About $10K to paint an Aztec, although this could wait. Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). That's about right and will get you leather and all new plastic, carpet, headliner, etc. Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. $5K-50K here, depending on what you want to do. Auto pilot broken. An STEC two axis AP is about $11K installed. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? An old neglected twin is never a good deal. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As other have posted. Two words of advice: "Run" and "Away". Seriously.
The plane you describe in the condition you describe is likely junk. Salvage. Please keep looking and find a decent airplane. Spend the $80k to get one "ready to go". Better yet, spend $100k and get a newer one in better condition. Airplane economics are unlike anything else on the planet (except maybe US government defense spending). You can easily spend way more to get this plane operational than it is worth. 1200 SMOH on the engines? Figure replacing both of them immediately. Why? A plane that has been deteriorated as you describe is not going to miraculously have decent engines. They are no doubt in the same shape as the rest of the plane. Beat up, cheaped out, worn out. If they were recent factory overhauls with warranties, MAYBE. One cracked cylinder... so far. Good airplanes are not sold with this kind of laundry list. The seller(s) KNOWS it will cost more to bring the thing up to snuff than they could possibly fetch. Otherwise, why would they not get the work done and MAKE MORE MONEY????? My rule of thumb is: consider a plane with no more than ONE weak area (engine(s)/prop(s), airframe paint, interior, avionics). This plane needs all 4. Game over. Your avionics guy is an excellent choice to check out the plane... AVIONICS. Nothing more. You need a type-familiar IA to do a $500-$1000 pre-buy inspection on this beast. Others will scream at that price (remember gang, 2 engines, 2 props, landing gear, 30+ year old plane), but pre-buys are just like insurance - pay a little, get a lot.. of risk! Don't worry, you will most likely never finish the pre-buy inspection. I would put money on the inspection stopping very early on when several other major problems are "discovered". The market is depressed and planes are moving slowly. You should be able to leverage a pretty good deal on a decent plane if you keep looking. Good Luck, Mike david wrote: I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. Auto pilot broken. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? Most of the similar year planes I have seen are about $80,000. My buddy is an avionics repaiman and would thoroughly check the plane prior to the purchase. Could it be resold at a profit if I needed to? Please give any advice as I don't want to make a big mistake. Thanks in advance. David *** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com *** Add a newsgroup interface to your website today. __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gear problem in an Aztec PA23-250 | Robert Borucki | General Aviation | 3 | December 17th 04 07:08 PM |
WTB: Piper Aztec C | Jim Burns | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 20th 04 07:38 PM |
PIREP: 2I3 (Rough River State Park, Falls of Rough, KY) | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 0 | March 1st 04 12:11 AM |
Piper Aztec handling qualities | John McFarlane | Owning | 1 | October 3rd 03 04:11 PM |
rough engine just after power reduction | Sydney Hoeltzli | Owning | 11 | July 30th 03 03:37 PM |