A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Navions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 27th 03, 05:28 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"rip" wrote in message . com...
I have this engine. Performs well, but the IO470, 520, 540, and 550 are
the engines of choice. The E series engines use a Hartzell prop subject
to a repetitive AD.


There is a Hartzell prop available without the AD, but you are right, your
choices are greater with the flanged crank rather than the splined one.

No NAvion is a speed demon, although there are those
who specialize in extracting some very repectable airspeeds from such a
large and roomy plane.


Sort of like souping up a Volkswagon. You can put all these mods on, but
she's still a volkswagon :-)


Are the hydraulics hard to maintain or troublesome

Not at all. As an A&P, I find the NAvion hydraulics easier to deal with
than electrical/mechanical systems. Very straightforward, very simple.


The Navion gear is simplicity itself compared with most other retracts.

Are they certified in Normal and Utility catagories (ie, can they be spun
intentionally?)

They are certified in both the Normal and Utility catagories.
"Aerobatics" beyond those required for a Commercial exam are not
approved, including spins.


Note that if you have a larger engine (from the 260 HP up or so), your
utility category load area is very small. While the extra HP and other mods
up the gross weight, they don't open open up the utility envelope. I can't
really fly in the utility envelope with anything other than myself and a small
fuel load.

  #2  
Old December 28th 03, 02:03 AM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:28:16 -0500, "Ron Natalie"
wrote:


"rip" wrote in message . com...
I have this engine. Performs well, but the IO470, 520, 540, and 550 are
the engines of choice. The E series engines use a Hartzell prop subject
to a repetitive AD.


There is a Hartzell prop available without the AD, but you are right, your
choices are greater with the flanged crank rather than the splined one.

No NAvion is a speed demon, although there are those
who specialize in extracting some very repectable airspeeds from such a
large and roomy plane.


Sort of like souping up a Volkswagon. You can put all these mods on, but
she's still a volkswagon :-)


Yah, but a very roomy and comfortable VW, unlike its ground bound
counterpart. :-))

snip

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.