A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GEM 1200 Problem



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18th 04, 04:40 AM
Jim Kaufeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kyler Laird wrote:

Jim Kaufeld writes:

Anyway, the GEM has an intermittently flaky display. Sometimes it goes crazy
and the bar graphs and digital temp readouts start fluctuating wildly. It
isn't just one engine and it isn't just one cylinder. Its all of them.


Does this look familiar?
http://lairds.org/Kyler/photos/disk0024/mvi_1757.avi
(It got much worse than that.)


Yes ... that looks familiar!

First verify that your engines are sufficiently grounded. Then
verify it again. Check your alternators while you're there.


What, exactly, should I check? I would have assumed that since the starters
work on both sides, the engines are sufficiently grounded. Is there typically
a separate ground that goes to the engine? Should I add one?

Next see if you can isolate a bad probe (or probes) by flying with
some disconnected.


One thing I've noticed is that when the GEM is working the CHT on the RE, #2
varies. I figure that either something is wrong with that probe or the
connections to the probe. Can just one badly connected probe -- or maybe a bad
probe -- make the whole instrument dance?


Thanks for the help.

Good luck.

--kyler


Jim Kaufeld

  #2  
Old February 18th 04, 01:12 PM
Kyler Laird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Kaufeld writes:

First verify that your engines are sufficiently grounded. Then
verify it again. Check your alternators while you're there.


What, exactly, should I check?


I'm not sure of the proper way to test, but there should be (next
to) no resistance between the engine and the airframe.

I would have assumed that since the starters
work on both sides, the engines are sufficiently grounded.


It seems reasonable to assume that but it is definitely not
correct. (I was a counterexample.)

(Incidentally, not long ago I really toasted some wires on a
grain truck upon starting it because its ground cable was loose.
It had been starting hard for awhile, but when the cable really
went, the starting current took another path, through a small
auxiliary cable. *Poof*)

Is there typically
a separate ground that goes to the engine? Should I add one?


There should be a big strap from the engine block to the engine
mount. The rubber cushions of the engine mount electrically
isolate the engine but there are probably other things that
provide a path to ground. Even a ground strap can become
ineffective (as in my case - corrosion, I recall).

Next see if you can isolate a bad probe (or probes) by flying with
some disconnected.


One thing I've noticed is that when the GEM is working the CHT on the RE, #2
varies. I figure that either something is wrong with that probe or the
connections to the probe. Can just one badly connected probe -- or maybe a bad
probe -- make the whole instrument dance?


Yes. It happened to me. (I had multiple problems last time.
That made the diagnosis much harder.)

The probes seem to die much more frequently than I'd like. I
recommend getting some extras to carry.

Thanks for the help.


You are welcome. I hope you solve it.

--kyler
  #3  
Old February 18th 04, 09:07 PM
Bill Hale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kyler Laird wrote in message ...
Jim Kaufeld writes:

First verify that your engines are sufficiently grounded. Then
verify it again. Check your alternators while you're there.


Kyler gives good advice.

The common mode rejection on most things that measure thermocouple
voltages isn't real high. So anything that can affect engine
grounds, etc can be a problem.

The GEM should be grounded to one of the engines. Doesn't the
1200 have 2 grounds?

Making sure that terminal is staked well would be a start.

Bill Hale A&P
  #4  
Old February 19th 04, 10:38 PM
Jim Kaufeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Bill Hale) wrote:

Kyler Laird wrote in message ...
Jim Kaufeld writes:

First verify that your engines are sufficiently grounded. Then
verify it again. Check your alternators while you're there.


There is a copper cable going from the engine to the airframe. It was
recently replaced (on both engines) as part of the STC to install copper cables
to replace the original aluminum cables. BTW, that replacement made a huge
difference starting; before the engines would barely turn over, now they spin
fast!

The ground cable on the engine goes to a ground bus on the firewall; that cable
is copper. A cable runs from the battery to that firewall ground bus. An
aluminum cable goes from there to the insrument panel ground bus.


Kyler gives good advice.

The common mode rejection on most things that measure thermocouple
voltages isn't real high. So anything that can affect engine
grounds, etc can be a problem.

The GEM should be grounded to one of the engines. Doesn't the
1200 have 2 grounds?


The GEM has one harness for each engine. The harness is continuous, that is,
it goes from screw connectors at the probes to the "plug" at the back of the
instrument. The ground and power are at the same point for both harnesses --
the instrument panel circuit breaker and the instrument panel ground bus.

Do you suppose that aluminum cable from the firewall ground bus to the
instrument panel ground bus could be the problem? There is no STC for that to
be replaced by copper ........


Making sure that terminal is staked well would be a start.


We're going to do that tomorrow (Friday), I think. Insight is sending us
another instrument and we're going to bring the airplane in and swap it as soon
as that instrument arrives. It might get delayed until Monday because one of
my partners is going to Sarasota tomorrow, early afternoon and returning on
Sunday.

Bill Hale A&P


Thanks again for the advice. Hopefully we'll track this gremlin down soon.

Jim Kaufeld
Jim Kaufeld

  #5  
Old February 20th 04, 01:23 AM
Ray Andraka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FWIW, the JPI instruments get grounded to the engine instead of to the instrument panel to avoid
this type of problem. Could it be that the GEM should be wired the same way?

--
--Ray Andraka, P.E.
President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc.
401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950
email
http://www.andraka.com

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A problem in the Military ? Nick Jade Military Aviation 54 March 15th 04 07:59 PM
Fiberglass Cowl Problem Boelkowj Home Built 6 December 20th 03 02:08 PM
Garmin fixes moving waypoint problem -- almost Jon Woellhaf Instrument Flight Rules 6 November 28th 03 05:29 PM
EGT Problem Dennis O'Connor Owning 4 August 27th 03 04:25 PM
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance [email protected] Owning 5 July 22nd 03 12:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.