![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan Young wrote:
Are you sure they put the correct prop on the plane? I know some of the new 172 series were produced with 160hp and others with 180hp. Although you have to hope the mechanics did a better job - if you have a 160hp it is possible they swapped props with a 180hp 172. A cruise prop would drag down both the static RPM and climb performance. On the other hand, you should notice a few mph improvement in cruise (unless the prop is grossly wrong). You will definitely feel the difference when you bring the power up for takeoff. The club I am in has three C172N's. One has a cruise prop. The first time I flew it, I thought something was wrong when it took what seemed (and actually was) a longer takeoff roll. I looked at the tach to see if the RPM was low, but it was fine. Once leveled off in cruise, I noticed the higher cruise airspeed and realized the prop difference. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Cessna 150 lost power with AD 96-12-06? | Ozzy Countin | Owning | 3 | August 17th 03 05:41 AM |