![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Geoffrey Barnes" said:
Under the terms of our lease with the owners of the 182, they are responsible for maintence costs, so the $70 to fix the plane seems to be pretty clearly their responsibility. All of the other costs are, with the club's lack of written policy, open to debate at the moment. What would your club or FBO do in this situation? Our club has a policy that if you leave a plane somewhere you're responsible for bringing it back or paying the costs for someone else to bring it back. When I got weathered in in Ottawa with no instrument rating, I had to pay the tach time for another club plane to come out with two instrument rated pilots, one of whom flew the plane I had come out in, and one to fly back the ferry plane. A very expensive weekend, I can tell you. Another time, however, a club member had a mechanical problem in Colorado on a Sunday. He had three options: 1 - Abandon the plane and fly home commercial 2 - Call out a mechanic at Sunday emergency call out rates 3 - Wait until Monday and have it fixed at normal shop rates. If he'd chosen the first, he agrees that he would have been responsible for covering the costs of bringing it back. If he'd chosen option 2, he feels the club would have covered the cost, and he's probably right about that. So he chose option 3, and billed the club for the cost of his hotel room for Sunday night. Now this caused a lot of dissention in the club, because some of us thought it was his responsibility to cover expenses caused by delays, since delays are a natural part of flying small aircraft over long distance, and other people took his side, that the hotel was a lot less than the amount we would have had to pay to get it fixed on Sunday, so the club came out ahead. Eventually the club paid his hotel bill. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ .... industry giant Microsoft Corporation... a company that has become successful without resorting to software testing... -- Unknown, rec.humor.funny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
Another time, however, a club member had a mechanical problem in Colorado on a Sunday. He had three options: 1 - Abandon the plane and fly home commercial 2 - Call out a mechanic at Sunday emergency call out rates 3 - Wait until Monday and have it fixed at normal shop rates. If he'd chosen the first, he agrees that he would have been responsible for covering the costs of bringing it back. If he'd chosen option 2, he feels the club would have covered the cost, and he's probably right about that. So he chose option 3, and billed the club for the cost of his hotel room for Sunday night. Now this caused a lot of dissention in the club, because some of us thought it was his responsibility to cover expenses caused by delays, since delays are a natural part of flying small aircraft over long distance, and other people took his side, that the hotel was a lot less than the amount we would have had to pay to get it fixed on Sunday, so the club came out ahead. Eventually the club paid his hotel bill. Then the club did the right thing. The club was on the hook for the costs of option #2 as soon as the mechanical problem occurred. Anything that the club member did that reduced that obligation was gravy to the club. IMHO the club should've picked up his meals, too, to the extent that the total outlay (Monday's repair costs + hotel + meals) didn't exceed what option #2 would have cost. Russell Kent |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 12th 04 03:03 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | General Aviation | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |