![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gene Kearns" wrote:
The fallacy of this argument is that (1) the FAA is not in the business of protecting FBOs any more than the aircraft owner's commercial interests and (2) the tax money is accepted by an airport authority..... not the FBO. I agree, but it's not that the FAA seeks to protect the FBO per se, it's that they may have no choice but to allow the airport operator/sponsor to write rules which reach an accommodation satisfactory to all parties. One of FAA's purposes in grant management is to keep reliever airports open and get full use of taxpayer money as dictated by Congress. In a case where fuel sales are judged important enough to dictate survivability of the airport, I just can't see FAA stepping in to defend the right of tentants to divert fuel dollars to local gas stations. It's not just the FBO that's hurt; the City loses on the per-gallon fees. What would happen in our case, as in the past where the City found its budgets threatened, is local Congress people intervene to "assist" all the parties in reaching an accommodation. It's unrealistic to me that FAA would initiate an action to trigger this process over an issue such as self-fueling. Their position at the table would be indefensible, since the cover by their own documents is the fuzzy definition of "reasonable restrictions." Tax funds are for the many not the airport authority and/or the FBO.... thus the laws prohibiting fraud and good-ole-boy networks.... the federal prohibition against granting exclusive aeronautical rights. Except FAA grant money may not be used for airport operations and maintenance, only capital improvements. Funds to operate come from us users, plus commonly subsidies by local gov't. There are limits to the latter that voters will tolerate, leaving only users to foot the bills. There's no good ole boy network at my airport; the City and the FBO don't like each other at all. But the voters are getting fed up with the airport, and the FBO has this aversion to net operating losses. Fred F. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: 6 Brand New MILITARY AVIATION Hardback Reference Books - AMAZING! | Bill | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 15th 04 07:10 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
looking for modern F-4 reference | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 1 | November 13th 03 08:39 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |