![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed. I won't fly hard IFR with a dry pump, and I laugh each time I
throw one of those Parker Hannafin "mandatory" notices in the trash, unopened. The last wet pump I had overhauled had over 3000 hours on it, and the overhaul facility changed the bearings, just so they could say they had done something. Javier Henderson wrote: (JFLEISC) writes: The typical "output" of these pumps is a lot of air with a fair amount of oil entrained, almost like the spray from an aerosol can. I've tried 4 or 5 different units, and only the Airwolf did what it was advertised to do. I was afraid of that. Cheaper to go with a dry pump, I think. I think it's more of a lottery. Wet pumps, from what I read, will outlast your engine, whereas dry pumps can last anywhere from .1 to many hundreds of hours. But let's say they last 500 hours on the average, that's four pumps over a 2000 hour TBO engine, reducing the financial advantage of the dry vs. wet pumps. -jav |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wet vs Dry Vacuum Pump | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | December 15th 04 05:17 PM |
Windmilling Prop & Vacuum Pump | Matt Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | October 14th 04 08:08 PM |
Wet Vacuum Pump | smackey | Owning | 6 | February 24th 04 07:03 PM |
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump | Greg Reid | Home Built | 15 | October 7th 03 07:09 PM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |