A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Piper Wing Lighting



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 30th 04, 10:18 PM
Jay Masino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

zatatime wrote:
All three turned on at idle would exceed the
alternator output.

Doesn't that make your airplane "illegal" (technically speaking of
course).
I thought the total draw of an electrical system could not exceed 80%
of the output capacity of the alternator.
Am I incorrect, or is there more to this concept?


The way it was explained to me, once upon a time, was... Landing/Taxi
lights are considered "intermitant loads" and are not added in for the 80%
load calculation. Same goes for pitot heat. In fact, when you're adding
up your loads, you only add the receive power draw for your Com radios,
and not the transmit power draw.

--- Jay

--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! !
http://www.oceancityairport.com
http://www.oc-adolfos.com
  #3  
Old October 31st 04, 03:23 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Masino wrote:
: The way it was explained to me, once upon a time, was... Landing/Taxi
: lights are considered "intermitant loads" and are not added in for the 80%
: load calculation. Same goes for pitot heat. In fact, when you're adding
: up your loads, you only add the receive power draw for your Com radios,
: and not the transmit power draw.

I just did the power budget on my Cherokee after installing a whole panel of
equipment. It's amazingly vague how one is supposed to calculate that stuff. I would
consider landing/taxi lights and landing gear operation (A friend has electric-gear'd
Comanche) "intermittent loads"... also probably the Tx on the COM (perhaps even
adjusted to the 20% duty cycle rated for the radios). I would *NOT* consider pitot
heat an intermittent load. I want that to be able to run whenever I need it.... even
if I shouldn't be in that situation to begin with. It'd rate it right up there with
carb heat for continuous operation.

-Cory

--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #5  
Old November 2nd 04, 03:29 AM
Ray Andraka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's 80% of the max alternator output current. Mine just barely came under
the 80% when they were installed, but then I later added an autopilot which
brought it over the 80%. The avionics shop got around it by adding a placard
stating something to the effect that the autopilot may not be engaged with the
landing lights on.


Jay Masino wrote:

zatatime wrote:
All three turned on at idle would exceed the
alternator output.

Doesn't that make your airplane "illegal" (technically speaking of
course).
I thought the total draw of an electrical system could not exceed 80%
of the output capacity of the alternator.
Am I incorrect, or is there more to this concept?


The way it was explained to me, once upon a time, was... Landing/Taxi
lights are considered "intermitant loads" and are not added in for the 80%
load calculation. Same goes for pitot heat. In fact, when you're adding
up your loads, you only add the receive power draw for your Com radios,
and not the transmit power draw.

--- Jay

--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! !
http://www.oceancityairport.com
http://www.oc-adolfos.com


--
--Ray Andraka, P.E.
President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc.
401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950
email
http://www.andraka.com

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Osan’s 51st Fighter Wing to get its own coin Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 April 5th 04 10:44 PM
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 March 18th 04 08:40 PM
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping Wright1902Glider Home Built 0 September 29th 03 03:40 PM
Can someone explain wing loading? Frederick Wilson Home Built 4 September 10th 03 02:33 AM
The Piper Cubs That Weren't Veeduber Home Built 5 August 28th 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.