![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BTIZ" wrote in message news:lmfnd.106367$bk1.76106@fed1read05... I won't argue with your POH! Does it give the speeds on both takeoffs? Mike MU-2 1.2 Vs for both conditions, premature raising of the nose or raising it to an excessive angle will result in a delayed takeoff. Normal takeoffs are with 10degree flap settings. At MAX GW, accelerate to 65-70mph, slight back pressure to let the airplane fly itself off the ground. Accelerate to normal climb. Enroute climb speed is 115mph, gets the nose down for visibility and air cooling into the engine and better forward speed. Short Field no obstacle, 25degree flap settings and lift off at the same 65-70mph at MAX GW. The text does state that with no obstacle, accelerate to best rate (Vy) 105mph This doesn't make sense to me. How can the plane take off shorter if the rotation is made at the same speed and the plane accelerates slower (with the flaps down.) Short Field With an obstacle, 25 degree flap, lift off at lowest possible airspeed and accelerate in ground effect to 95mph, (Vx), climb at 95mph until the obstacle is cleared, then accelerate to 105mph (Vy) This sounds more like what I would expect. The question I now have is whether the distance figures you gave earlier are for the "short field with obstacle" or without the obstacle. Also the speeds I am interested in are the speeds at the 50' obstacle. The basic theory that I am espousing (supported by several POHs) is that a certain amount of energy is added to the airplane between being stationary on the ground and being 50' higher and moving at some speed. Since flaps do nothing except increase the drag on the ground roll and have a lower l/d, less energy is availible to accelerate and climb with the flaps down. This is only valid if the speeds at the 50 obstacle are equal. Mike MU-2 I should add that this is from the 1973 PA-32-300, fixed gear, fat wings. BT. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1.2 Vs for both conditions, premature raising of the nose or raising it
to an excessive angle will result in a delayed takeoff. Normal takeoffs are with 10degree flap settings. At MAX GW, accelerate to 65-70mph, slight back pressure to let the airplane fly itself off the ground. Accelerate to normal climb. Enroute climb speed is 115mph, gets the nose down for visibility and air cooling into the engine and better forward speed. Short Field no obstacle, 25degree flap settings and lift off at the same 65-70mph at MAX GW. The text does state that with no obstacle, accelerate to best rate (Vy) 105mph This doesn't make sense to me. How can the plane take off shorter if the rotation is made at the same speed and the plane accelerates slower (with the flaps down.) Short Field With an obstacle, 25 degree flap, lift off at lowest possible airspeed and accelerate in ground effect to 95mph, (Vx), climb at 95mph until the obstacle is cleared, then accelerate to 105mph (Vy) This sounds more like what I would expect. The question I now have is whether the distance figures you gave earlier are for the "short field with obstacle" or without the obstacle. Also the speeds I am interested in are the speeds at the 50' obstacle. The basic theory that I am espousing (supported by several POHs) is that a certain amount of energy is added to the airplane between being stationary on the ground and being 50' higher and moving at some speed. Since flaps do nothing except increase the drag on the ground roll and have a lower l/d, less energy is availible to accelerate and climb with the flaps down. This is only valid if the speeds at the 50 obstacle are equal. Mike MU-2 I should add that this is from the 1973 PA-32-300, fixed gear, fat wings. BT. Mike.. like I said, it's a 1973 manual... so details are not very forth coming. Previous distances were for normal (10degree flap) and short field (25 degree flap) Speeds at the 50ft mark based on the text would not be the same. Normal take off, 10degree flap, plane will lift off at about 65-70 and allowed to accelerate in climb to enroute cruise climb speed of 115. The 50ft speed should be somewhere between 70 and 115. Short field, lift off as soon as possible, accelerate in ground effect to 95 (Vx) and maintain Vx until clear of obstacle, so the 50ft speed should be 95. The distance charts are not easy to interpolate, but the Max GW at Sea Level differences are not much more than 100ft. BT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Alternator field cycling & alternator damage | Nathan Young | Owning | 7 | November 14th 04 09:02 PM |
Judge halts work on Navy landing field in eastern N.C. | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 1 | April 21st 04 12:04 PM |
Generators, redundancy, and old stories | Michael | Owning | 2 | March 3rd 04 06:25 PM |
fzzzzt, popped alternator breaker C-172M | Mike Z. | Owning | 8 | November 7th 03 02:28 PM |