![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2SX wrote:
I know this has been discussed and discussed here, but I wanted to share some information that I just received from the company that produces a few excellent training computer programs for avionics. Some background - I flew a cherokee 180 with a 430 for about 5 years. This year I moved to a Lance and put in the cnx-80 and mx-20. I have flown the heck out of that plane this year, so I have a good bit of flying time with both the 430 and cnx-80 (it is in the shop now getting "upgraded" to a 480). I purchased the cnx-80 over a 430 (which I was very familiar with) for the same reasons that have been expressed here before - airways, vertical appraoch guidance, faster processer (and thus better response time), etc. Being used to the 430, I did have some transition time getting used to the cnx-80, but I am as, if not more, comfortable with the new box as I was with the 430. I think the "overkill" or too complex arguments have been a bit overstated. Now my point, I have used the autopilot and lightning educational software from Electronic Flight Solutions. I thought I knew everything about those systems, but was surprised by how much I learned. So I inquired about a 480 trainer. I was told that there were no plans for that b/c the expectation was that the 480 would not be around much longer. His argument was that once the $5,000 waas upgrade for the 430/530 is released next year, garmin would likely dump the 480. He sais the 480 was just too complicated. As I indicated, I strongly disagree with that. What do you think? What are the implications for us cnx-80 owners with such a short-lived product? What do I think? I think since Electronic Solutions offers training material for the 430 and not the 480, it is in their interest to promote the impression that the 480 won't be around much longer. Unless you work for Garmin, it's all speculation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CNX80 versus GNS430 | Wayne Sweet | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 3rd 04 02:36 PM |
Garmin GNS-430 vs. CNX80 | Mike Adams | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 17th 04 04:57 AM |
Garmin GNS-430 vs. CNX80 | Mike Adams | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 04 01:20 PM |
CNX80 for sale, new | richard riley | Home Built | 0 | December 29th 03 05:20 PM |
Anyone have the new Apollo CNX80 | Jeff | Owning | 2 | September 30th 03 05:43 PM |