molding plexiglas websites?

On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:49:47 -0600, wrote:

Nope,
This is the very small third window in an old bonanza. Lots of older
bonanza's didn't have a window here and it was an option.

Never an option. The a/c came with it or it didn't. many owners of
the oldies put a 3rd window kit in themselves. Great for visibility
when backing the plane up, but destroyed the classic look.

i have a clear one to put in, but i want to tint it. There there doesn't
need to be one there in the first place, the tinted one won't pass as
much heat/uv.
I as an owner can make a window if I want as an owner produced part and
I as an A&P can install it as such.
Adding tint to a clear plastic window isn't suggested as the tint can
craze the plastic.

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true? Besides, if you count your time you've already spent
too much screwing with this. They're about $30.00 each from GLAP.
And since they're not that "bent" it shouldn't be too much of a
problem to make your own.


It's not a compound curve just a bend along a single axis.

Hope this helps

Dave

Jon A. writes:

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't.

Jim



"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...
Jon A. writes:

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't.

Jim



"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...
Jon A. writes:

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.

An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the
manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated.

Or a 337 with and STC is used.

Or a field approval is obtained.

"Jon A." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't.

Jim



"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...
Jon A. writes:

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.

That doesn't HAPPEN to be true, but I'll let you deal with your FSDO any way
you want.

Nobody ever said that "willy nilly" (whatever the hell that means) was an
option. You spend a deuce of a lot of time as an apprentice learning what
looks like airplane and what doesn't.

Jim



"Dan Thompson" wrote in message
. com...
An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints
the manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated.

Or a 337 with and STC is used.

Or a field approval is obtained.



No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.

Draw your own conclusions.

http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/news/arch...2002/Parts.htm

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:58:15 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

That doesn't HAPPEN to be true, but I'll let you deal with your FSDO any way
you want.

Nobody ever said that "willy nilly" (whatever the hell that means) was an
option. You spend a deuce of a lot of time as an apprentice learning what
looks like airplane and what doesn't.

Jim

And you spend more time justifying doing something that isn't right.
Gotta go, I'm curing some rubber for my airplane tires and it'll go
bad if I don't get right on it!




"Dan Thompson" wrote in message
.com...
An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints
the manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated.

Or a 337 with and STC is used.

Or a field approval is obtained.



No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:10:47 GMT, "Dan Thompson"
wrote:

An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the
manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated.

Or a 337 with and STC is used.

Or a field approval is obtained.

Holy Crap! Someone else that reads the entire passage, not just what
they want to see! Hope you have your armor on. The pseudo lawyers
are going to get you!


"Jon A." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't.

Jim



"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...
Jon A. writes:

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.

Jon A. wrote:

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:10:47 GMT, "Dan Thompson"
wrote:


An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the
manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated.

Or a 337 with and STC is used.

Or a field approval is obtained.


Holy Crap! Someone else that reads the entire passage, not just what
they want to see! Hope you have your armor on. The pseudo lawyers
are going to get you!


What your indicating is that owner produced parts need to have a 337 to
install. SHOW ME THE REGS!!

The fabricated part does not have to match the origial blueprints. If it
does, SHOW ME THE REGS!!

Lets have anytime someone makes a statement or somebody questions a
statement about what you can do and what you can't do, provide the
regulations to back up that statement.


SHOW ME THE REGS!!

Dave



"Jon A." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:


The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't.

Jim



"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...

Jon A. writes:


Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.