![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 21:51:32 GMT, "Randy Wentzel"
wrote: First, I would like to say thank you to this group and the folks over at rec.aviation.student for being such a valuable, mature resource. It's hard to find that within Usenet now-a-days. OK, on to my question: During my flight training, I was taught that it's best to come in high "so that the runway is guaranteed throughout the pattern," even if the engine were to fail. This is fine and dandy, but I always come in with the VASI indicating "white over white" and with the tower noting my position to other aircraft in the pattern as "the Cessna on a short, high final." I feel completely comfortable with my approaches and *usually* flare before the numbers. VASI approaches now seem too shallow for a visual approach. OK...my take... I see nothing wrong with coming in above the VASI glide slope...in the day time and at a strip you know well. Night time and unknown strips are another matter. Gainsville Ga is a good example. Looking at the AFD you will find the runways are plenty long so unless you are one of those who adds "a little extra" there should be no danger of overshooting...BUT if you come in after dark and without the VASI guidance for the one runway (I forget which now) it will be an interesting experience. That one runway is considerably higher in the center than at the ends. Using the VASI gives you guidance right to the touchdown area. Goodland KS is another, but just the opposite of Gainsville. Here the middle of the runway is considerably lower than either end. I'm assuming you normally use a short strip to usually flare before the numbers. "I think" flight instructors who teach "landing on the numbers" do a great disservice to their students. It may not be their goal, but it ingrains what can be a dangerous habit and one that is really annoying at large airports. They can achieve the same results by picking a spot, such as the touchdown zone and going for precision. If it's a short strip, by all means use short field technique, but on longer strips landing on the numbers removes a safety cushion. The same one that "staying within gliding distance" provides. There are techniques for getting rid of altitude, but none that will add more distance when you have neither the speed nor altitude to trade. I fly high performance and rarely fly the VASI during the day. I rarely fly a stabilized approach during the day, but I fly both at night. IF I have passengers who are unfamiliar with flying, I fly a stabilized approach with nice gentle turns and do fly the VASI. One other comment...The VASI may seem shallow (and it is compared to most VFR finals), but it should bring you to the runway at the touchdown zone where you should be touching down, not the numbers. Don't land long on short strips and don'l land short on long strips. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) What are your feelings on this? Best, Randy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nader calls White House Israel's puppet -ot | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 04 06:39 AM |
White soot on exhaust | R. Wubben | Owning | 4 | April 19th 04 04:46 PM |
Study shows USAF makeup mostly white, male | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 27th 04 10:01 PM |
F-104 White Wings? | Jack G | Military Aviation | 1 | January 24th 04 09:24 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |