|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
March 5th 04, 10:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
In Richard Lamb wrote:
I thought it was about a Zodiac, but i've been wrong before... Could have sworn they was talking about a CH701 STOL. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ 
|
|
#2
March 5th 04, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Del Rawlins wrote:
In Richard Lamb wrote: I thought it was about a Zodiac, but i've been wrong before... Could have sworn they was talking about a CH701 STOL. I was talking about a CH701 rear fuselage. I agree that you should lighten and simplify whenever possible. One reason not to do anything is that the panels make quite a racket as buffeting occurs near stall. Maybe this is just another genius of Chris Heinz? thanks everybody for the discussion tom
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
