A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Good News! Arrest in plane theft case



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 4th 03, 03:29 AM
Jamie Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Larry Fransson wrote:

So this was in New Jersey, right? The state that requires double locks on all aircraft? Uh huh. Lotta good that did. It just goes to show that locks only serve to keep honest people honest.


A standard ignition lock and locked door counts as "double locks" according to the New Jersey Division of Aeronautics. http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2003/03-1-146x_faqs.html
Double locking your aircraft is only required when the aircraft is left unused for at least 24 hours. I don't know anybody who intentionally leaves their magnetos hot, and locking the door sounds
like pretty good common sense to me, especially in a place where avionic thefts have occurred.



  #2  
Old November 4th 03, 05:16 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


and locking the door sounds
like pretty good common sense to me


Yes, but that's not the same as being required by law to lock the door.

It makes good sense not to drink gasoline too. But I don't think there's a law
against it (except perhaps the law against using gasoline for "other than its
intended purpose")

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #3  
Old November 4th 03, 08:11 AM
Mike O'Malley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

and locking the door sounds
like pretty good common sense to me


Yes, but that's not the same as being required by law to lock the door.

It makes good sense not to drink gasoline too. But I don't think there's a

law
against it (except perhaps the law against using gasoline for "other than its
intended purpose")


Of course, that assumes you have a door that locks. Or a door period. And many
of those without doors, also don't have keyed ignition switches. Makes it kind
of hard to double lock your plane.


  #4  
Old November 4th 03, 11:20 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Mike O'Malley"
wrote:

Of course, that assumes you have a door that locks. Or a door period.
And many
of those without doors, also don't have keyed ignition switches. Makes
it kind
of hard to double lock your plane.



And, of course, no one should make the mistake of assuming that the NJ
legislature (sp?) knows enough about aircraft and security to understand
the impact and effectivenss of their laws.

--
Bob Noel
  #5  
Old November 4th 03, 08:25 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mike O'Malley wrote:


Makes it kind of hard to double lock your plane.


Prop locks count. Throttle locks count. "The Club" counts. A logging chain and
Master padlock counts.

It may cost you a C-note, but it isn't hard to double lock a plane.

George Patterson
If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging
the problem.
  #6  
Old November 8th 03, 06:43 AM
Pokey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ...
Mike O'Malley wrote:


Makes it kind of hard to double lock your plane.


Prop locks count. Throttle locks count. "The Club" counts. A logging chain and
Master padlock counts.

It may cost you a C-note, but it isn't hard to double lock a plane.

George Patterson


Reminds me of a prank played on young maintenance guys in the Air
Force. They would be sent somewhere to get the keys to a particular
bird, not realizing that the birds do not require keys. Strange, when
you compare the cost and the potential lethality of fighter aircraft
vs. GA craft.
Pokey
  #9  
Old November 5th 03, 03:18 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike O'Malley" wrote in message ...

In NJ we can't even pump our own gasoline, so I wouldn't be suprised
if there *is* a law against drinking it :-)


I always chuckled at that- when I was working there, I couldn't put gas into my
own car. But I could fuel up my own airplane all day. Go figure.

That's because the small service station owner's lobby doesn't care anything about
airplanes. The reason you can't pump your own gas is to discourage the large
gas-n-go operations from coming in and pushing out the small operators.

Of course, even with full service, low gas taxes (nice to have several oil companies
headquartered in your state) mean that the gas prices are cheaper in NJ than in all
the neighboring states. Regularly fill up in Penns Grove (last exit in NJ) on my way
out of the state.

For NJ residents, this is totally wiped out by the rediculous insurance system there
caused by the fact that the legislature seems primarily composed of personal injury
lawyers.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
12 Jul 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 July 12th 04 09:22 PM
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 November 30th 03 05:57 PM
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 19th 03 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.