![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" om wrote in
message ... [...] You should always be dividing your attention between inside and outside. IMHO, not even close. Not for VFR flight. The airplane is perfectly flyable without ANY reference to the instruments, or anything inside the airplane. Turning base to final is no time to be wasting ANY effort looking at instruments, and is certainly no time to be attempting to use the instruments as feedback for control inputs. A pilot who cannot judge bank angle and coordination without consulting the turn coordinator and attitude indicator is one who needs to get back to the basics. What happens to low hours, and even high hours pilots when they are stressed, is fixating on the view outside the plane and pushing the plane into a stall spin trying to turn too tightly back to the runway centerline. They only do that if they fail to keep the airplane coordinated. One does not need to consult the instrument panel in order to keep the airplane coordinated. [...] Pilots, especially students, should be checking airspeed, etc. all through the pattern. Again, not necessary at all. It's all well and good to keep an eye on things, of course. But any pilot should be able to go extended periods of time in the pattern without looking at the ASI or any other instrument. Airspeed in particular should be second-nature. Pitch and power will result in the desired airspeed, and a pilot familiar with the airplane knows what pitch and power to set in the pattern. Additionally, aircraft noise and control feel gives you reasonably good information about airspeed (within five knots or so). I check my airspeed indicator maybe a couple of times before turning final, and then maybe two or three more times while flying final, assuming everything else is going fine. It's certainly not a significant part of my visual scan. The vast majority of my visual scan is devoted to looking outside the airplane. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You've been flying a long, long time and I'm sure you've forgotten a lot
about being low hours ![]() I think we're talking about learning here, getting TO the basics; not getting back to them. How do you learn to fly using only the windshield and the seat of your pants except by looking at the instruments? How can you learn the proper feel of 75 knots unless you know it is 75 knots? Sure, a better way of teaching flying would be to cover up the instruments and have the CFI go, "A little faster, you're skidding a bit, less bank....". But, they don't do that. They teach you a little bit and then send you up there on your own. Like most pilots, I look at the instruments less and less in the pattern as I gain experience. I look at airspeed and RPM a lot in pattern work to be sure I'm remaining consistent. A lot means a quick glance at midfield, base, and final. If you don't check, what feels like 75 knots could easily drift up or down. Like you, I hardly look below the glareshield on most regular landings unless I haven't flown in a while. It's different when too when you fly a lot. Many pilots can only fly 2 - 3 times a month. It's easy to argue that they should leave the air to pros like yourself but GA wouldn't exist as we know it if they did. There is also the issue of flying different aircraft. One 172 will feel and sound very different at a certain speed than another. The low time pilot who forgets to adjust his seat may not allow for a different sight picture. Flying a 152 one day and a 172 a few days later as often happens in some training situations can get the student who ignores the panel in trouble. Telling students and low frequency fliers that they should not include the instruments in their scan is actually dangerous advice. -- Roger Long The airplane is perfectly flyable without ANY reference to the instruments, or anything inside the airplane. Turning base to final is no time to be wasting ANY effort looking at instruments, and is certainly no time to be attempting to use the instruments as feedback for control inputs. A pilot who cannot judge bank angle and coordination without consulting the turn coordinator and attitude indicator is one who needs to get back to the basics. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote
How do you learn to fly using only the windshield and the seat of your pants...... Real easy, it's called attitude flying. Sure, a better way of teaching flying would be to cover up the instruments and have the CFI go, "A little faster, No...I said "lower the nose a little...now fix that picture in your mind". They teach you a little bit and then send you up there on your own. No student of mine solo'ed without one whole period in the pattern with the entire instrument panel covered. It's called "flying the airplane", not "video gamming". Bob Moore ATP CFI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" om wrote in
message ... You've been flying a long, long time and I'm sure you've forgotten a lot about being low hours ![]() [...] Telling students and low frequency fliers that they should not include the instruments in their scan is actually dangerous advice. When I was a student, with relatively few hours, during my night training, we flew approaches without any interior lights at all, to simulate an electrical failure. Even at that point, I was able to fly the airplane without reference to the ASI, turn coordinator, and attitude indicator. I don't feel that I was an unusually talented student. I had all the same hurdles to cross as any student, with all the usual learning plateaus. IMHO, if a private pilot cannot fly the airplane without reference to the instruments, it is not because they are inherently not able to. It's because no instructor ever bothered to give them appropriate training. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But look what you turned into. You are obviously an ubermench.
-- Roger Long Peter Duniho wrote in message ... "Roger Long" om wrote in message ... You've been flying a long, long time and I'm sure you've forgotten a lot about being low hours ![]() [...] Telling students and low frequency fliers that they should not include the instruments in their scan is actually dangerous advice. When I was a student, with relatively few hours, during my night training, we flew approaches without any interior lights at all, to simulate an electrical failure. Even at that point, I was able to fly the airplane without reference to the ASI, turn coordinator, and attitude indicator. I don't feel that I was an unusually talented student. I had all the same hurdles to cross as any student, with all the usual learning plateaus. IMHO, if a private pilot cannot fly the airplane without reference to the instruments, it is not because they are inherently not able to. It's because no instructor ever bothered to give them appropriate training. Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" om wrote in
message ... But look what you turned into. You are obviously an ubermench. I appreciate the compliment, but I don't see what it has to do with the question at hand. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter Duniho wrote: A pilot who cannot judge bank angle and coordination without consulting the turn coordinator and attitude indicator is one who needs to get back to the basics. I can't speak for anyone else, but I've never been able to judge turn coordination without the use of the ball (bank angle, I'm "ok" on). If I don't look at the ball, I have no idea if I'm coordinated or not. My instructor tried very hard to get me to judge coordination "naturally", but I just never got it. How do you teach something like that? --Ken |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken Hornstein" wrote in message
... I can't speak for anyone else, but I've never been able to judge turn coordination without the use of the ball (bank angle, I'm "ok" on). If I don't look at the ball, I have no idea if I'm coordinated or not. My instructor tried very hard to get me to judge coordination "naturally", but I just never got it. How do you teach something like that? I will bet that you can at least judge coordination well enough to avoid serious problems. Keeping the ball smack in the middle is a lot harder than making sure the airplane isn't skidding dangerously. In fact, I suspect most people who claim that they need the turn coordinator are simply underestimating the sensitivity of that instrument. You can keep your flying pretty good and still have the ball slip out of center a little bit. Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter Duniho wrote: "Ken Hornstein" wrote in message ... I can't speak for anyone else, but I've never been able to judge turn coordination without the use of the ball (bank angle, I'm "ok" on). If I don't look at the ball, I have no idea if I'm coordinated or not. My instructor tried very hard to get me to judge coordination "naturally", but I just never got it. How do you teach something like that? I will bet that you can at least judge coordination well enough to avoid serious problems. Well, shoot .... how do I tell? I mean, I have _no_ sense of coordination. If you were to put me in a skid, I have no idea how that feels. During climbout, I always have to cross-check with the ball to make sure I'm coordinated; I can never do that on feel. I'm better with that now, but that's because I know the right amount of control pressure to use on the rudder, not because I know what coordinated flight feels like. During slips, the only thing that tells me I'm in a slip is the ball. --Ken |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You'll feel like you're sliding across the seat one way or the other. Or
like you're going around a curve in a car instead of just being pushed straight down in the seat. mike regish "Ken Hornstein" wrote in message ... In article , Peter Duniho wrote: "Ken Hornstein" wrote in message ... I can't speak for anyone else, but I've never been able to judge turn coordination without the use of the ball (bank angle, I'm "ok" on). If I don't look at the ball, I have no idea if I'm coordinated or not. My instructor tried very hard to get me to judge coordination "naturally", but I just never got it. How do you teach something like that? I will bet that you can at least judge coordination well enough to avoid serious problems. Well, shoot .... how do I tell? I mean, I have _no_ sense of coordination. If you were to put me in a skid, I have no idea how that feels. During climbout, I always have to cross-check with the ball to make sure I'm coordinated; I can never do that on feel. I'm better with that now, but that's because I know the right amount of control pressure to use on the rudder, not because I know what coordinated flight feels like. During slips, the only thing that tells me I'm in a slip is the ball. --Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
How 'bout a thread on the F-22 with no mud slinging, no axe grinding, no emotional diatribes, and just some clear, objective discussion? | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 23 | January 8th 04 12:39 AM |
This post will clear a lot of things up | Jack White | Military Aviation | 0 | September 14th 03 10:52 AM |