A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 17th 03, 01:31 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

which makes it non responsive to general aviation?

a very bad deal..

ATC clearances go on the auction block... how bad do you really need to go..

BT

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Who stands to gain from ATC privatization? Are there major businesses
that do this now, and others that are quietly preparing to pick up

some
fat federal ATC contracts? Do these companies have any connection to
the white house and friends?


It will be sold off to the airlines which makes a lot of sense. Sell a
national asset to companies that are struggling to either avoid or get

out
of bankruptcy. Maybe the White House think that putting ATC into their
balance sheets will give the airlines more strength.


An ATC responsive to common carriers has a very real apeal.




  #2  
Old November 17th 03, 03:00 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:AxVtb.3417$Ue4.381@fed1read01...
which makes it non responsive to general aviation?


Nope, but privatization is about money and jobs.

a very bad deal..


GA gets a big slab of pork right up front.

ATC clearances go on the auction block... how bad do you really need to

go..

That is where we are headed without a change.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Who stands to gain from ATC privatization? Are there major

businesses
that do this now, and others that are quietly preparing to pick up

some
fat federal ATC contracts? Do these companies have any connection

to
the white house and friends?


It will be sold off to the airlines which makes a lot of sense. Sell a
national asset to companies that are struggling to either avoid or get

out
of bankruptcy. Maybe the White House think that putting ATC into their
balance sheets will give the airlines more strength.


An ATC responsive to common carriers has a very real apeal.






  #3  
Old November 17th 03, 09:41 PM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:AxVtb.3417$Ue4.381@fed1read01...
which makes it non responsive to general aviation?

a very bad deal..

ATC clearances go on the auction block... how bad do you really need to

go..


During peak times, through major traffic areas....


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tower Enroute Control? Sam Jones Instrument Flight Rules 5 June 2nd 04 02:31 AM
Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA PlanetJ Instrument Flight Rules 168 December 6th 03 01:51 PM
Preferred Routing or Tower Enroute Control cefarthing Instrument Flight Rules 3 November 30th 03 04:53 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 3 October 1st 03 05:39 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.