![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause
(s) of this accident as follows: The inadequate visual lookout of both pilots. Factors in the accident were the FAA controller's failure to provide a traffic advisory, the improper decision among the three controllers to leave only one controller in the cab, and night conditions. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yep.. sounds like an FAA finding.. pilots were ultimately responsible to
provide visual lookout... but the FAA tower controllers failures and managements manning decision are secondary factors.. bet to see the same type of report for the on runway intersection accident at VGT last Sept. BT "Thomas Ploch" wrote in message . .. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause (s) of this accident as follows: The inadequate visual lookout of both pilots. Factors in the accident were the FAA controller's failure to provide a traffic advisory, the improper decision among the three controllers to leave only one controller in the cab, and night conditions. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() yep.. sounds like an FAA finding.. pilots were ultimately responsible to provide visual lookout... but the FAA tower controllers failures and managements manning decision are secondary factors. Were it the other way around, it would have to go hand in hand with a severe reduction in VFR freedoms. If the contrllers are responsible for preventing midairs on a clear day, then the controllers will be CONTROLLING your airplane. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Teacherjh wrote:
Were it the other way around, it would have to go hand in hand with a severe reduction in VFR freedoms. If the contrllers are responsible for preventing midairs on a clear day, then the controllers will be CONTROLLING your airplane. Or to put it another way, class C and D airspace will become class B. I agree that it's easy to be lulled into a false sense of security flying VFR in class C or D. All the best, David |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Class D or any "Tower" control is only responsible for the separation of
aircraft on the runway.. not on downwind or on final.. runway separation is all that any tower is responsible for.. and they did not get that right at VGT. I do not reference the "radar rooms" associated with Tower operations. BT "David Megginson" wrote in message . cable.rogers.com... Teacherjh wrote: Were it the other way around, it would have to go hand in hand with a severe reduction in VFR freedoms. If the contrllers are responsible for preventing midairs on a clear day, then the controllers will be CONTROLLING your airplane. Or to put it another way, class C and D airspace will become class B. I agree that it's easy to be lulled into a false sense of security flying VFR in class C or D. All the best, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-1B accident report released | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 18th 04 10:55 PM |
FS: 2002 "Ghosts: A Time Remembered" (Aviation) Calendar | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | June 14th 04 06:22 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Thunderbirds Accident Report Released | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:23 AM |
HH-60 ACCIDENT REPORT RELEASED | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 4th 03 03:06 AM |