A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Certified to Experimental?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 03, 07:18 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jeff Franks ) wrote:

Just wondering. Is it possible (read practical) to take a certified
aircraft (C172 for example) and have it "demoted" to an Experimental?


A few weeks ago, I saw a 2003 C182 that had been "demoted" to an
Experimental due to the installed Garmin G1000 avionics. I was told that
this aircraft could not carry passengers because of this status, so we were
unable to see the avionics in action.

FWIW...


--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #2  
Old December 4th 03, 12:29 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time...
many home builts and gliders are certified experimental..

the aircraft must be marked "experimental" in letters of a stated size and
in an area visible to the pax

must have been an insurance thing..

BT

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
Jeff Franks ) wrote:

Just wondering. Is it possible (read practical) to take a certified
aircraft (C172 for example) and have it "demoted" to an Experimental?


A few weeks ago, I saw a 2003 C182 that had been "demoted" to an
Experimental due to the installed Garmin G1000 avionics. I was told that
this aircraft could not carry passengers because of this status, so we

were
unable to see the avionics in action.

FWIW...


--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption

=---


  #3  
Old December 4th 03, 12:57 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:Jdvzb.2374$yf.275@fed1read01...
could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time...
many home builts and gliders are certified experimental..


Not all experimentals carry the "amateur" or "kit-built" designation.

the aircraft must be marked "experimental" in letters of a stated size and
in an area visible to the pax


True, for experimentals that are permitted to carry passengers. So?

must have been an insurance thing..


No, it was more likely an FAA thing. As in, with the installed avionics,
the plane was probably being operated under an R&D or "showing compliance"
designation, neither of which allow the carriage of passengers.

Pete


  #4  
Old December 4th 03, 01:03 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:Jdvzb.2374$yf.275@fed1read01...
could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time...
many home builts and gliders are certified experimental..


Not all experimentals carry the "amateur" or "kit-built" designation.


True


the aircraft must be marked "experimental" in letters of a stated size

and
in an area visible to the pax


True, for experimentals that are permitted to carry passengers. So?

just a side bar note

must have been an insurance thing..


No, it was more likely an FAA thing. As in, with the installed avionics,
the plane was probably being operated under an R&D or "showing compliance"
designation, neither of which allow the carriage of passengers.

Pete



could be...


  #5  
Old December 4th 03, 01:06 AM
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"BTIZ" wrote

could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time...
many home builts and gliders are certified experimental..


There are several categories of "Experimental".
1 Amateur Built
2 Exhibition
3 Research and Development
4 Air Racing
5 Crew Training
6 Market Survey
7 To Show Compliance With The CFR

Sounds as if you are only familiar with Amateur Built and Exhibition.

Bob Moore
  #6  
Old December 4th 03, 12:49 AM
Neal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:29:35 -0800, "BTIZ"
wrote:

could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time...
many home builts and gliders are certified experimental..

the aircraft must be marked "experimental" in letters of a stated size and
in an area visible to the pax

must have been an insurance thing..


When the FAA grants an experimental cert on a former standard cert
aircraft, they virtually always remove your ability to legally carry
pax afterwards. This is the established precedent.

What we need is an "experimental-antique" type of cert that would
allow full owner maintenance and simple A&P annual "condition
inspections" on old, small planes just like the homebuilt aircraft
enjoy today.
  #7  
Old December 4th 03, 07:55 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is more than one category of Experimental... and a certified
airplane that is "demoted" to experimental is most certainly NOT
"amatuer built".

Dave

BTIZ wrote:
could not carry pax in an experimental? happens all the time...
many home builts and gliders are certified experimental..

the aircraft must be marked "experimental" in letters of a stated size and
in an area visible to the pax

must have been an insurance thing..

BT

"Peter R." wrote in message
...

Jeff Franks ) wrote:


Just wondering. Is it possible (read practical) to take a certified
aircraft (C172 for example) and have it "demoted" to an Experimental?


A few weeks ago, I saw a 2003 C182 that had been "demoted" to an
Experimental due to the installed Garmin G1000 avionics. I was told that
this aircraft could not carry passengers because of this status, so we


were

unable to see the avionics in action.

FWIW...


--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet


News==----

http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000


Newsgroups

---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption


=---



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 07:17 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 2 February 2nd 04 11:41 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.