![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Freshfighter" wrote:
1) Which fase (initial descent, ILS approach, approach stability, flare, touchdown, taxi) of an approach and landing do you find most difficult and why? Flare. This is the most difficult to judge with consistency, the goal (in my airplane) being to have the wheels touch just as the stall warning sounds. Flaring too soon can result in a stall at some height above the runway, with possibly damaging results. Flaring too late can produce a 3-point, high speed landing or, worse, a nose wheel-first landing, also with possibly damaging results. 2) Which specific tasks during approach and landing do you find most difficult to combine? Scanning and monitoring and seeing and avoiding traffic. 3) Which of the four primary tasks, defined below, do you find hardest to combine during an approach and landing? Scanning and monitoring, ATC task 4) Which of the four primary tasks are most demanding for the pilot flying and the pilot non flying? If possible, you could also mention some very demanding specific subtasks. PF: scanning and monitoring PNF: scanning and monitoring 5) Which external factors (e.g. bad wheather, disagreements with other crewmembers) do you find the most influencing on the general pilot workload? Bad weather. Nothing else (besides mechanical or medical emergencies) comes close to this as a workload-increasing factor. 6) Which parameters (length runway, slope runway, crosswind, weather, available aids,...) do you find most important for the difficulty of a landing? Crosswind, wind shear and ice on the runway. 7) If you could make a suggestion to the authorities like the FAA to alleviate the workload during approach and landing, what would this be? Create more straght-in LNAV/VNAV (GPS) instrument approaches. 8) If you believe important aspects are not adressed in the questionnaire, please mention them here. Any other comments are also welcome here. Your questionnaire seems to concern task saturation. This is a poorly understood factor in many aviation accidents, in my opinion. One aspect of this is the man-machine interfaces pilots must operate during high workload situations. The GPS navigation systems I have used are particularly bad in this respect, but instrument panel clutter also contributes. Extra information; if you could provide me with general information about yourself, this would be much appreciated: - general aviation or commercial - estimate of flight hours My perspective is that of an instrument rated, private pilot flying a light, single-engine aircraft. I usually do not have a copilot. I have about 750 hours. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |