![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jeff Franks wrote:
Both of these are "blacklists" that many mailservers use to try to prevent spamming. I don't like blacklists for flat rejecting mail. I prefer to use a spam scoring system - the one I use is called SpamAssassin, and I have it installed on the mail server for everyone who uses my system to get email. SpamAssassin assigns scores for each spam indicator - it uses a combination of its own rules, a Baysean filter, the DCC and the Spamhaus RBL. Matching a single rule - for example, if your IP address is in the SBL, won't mean you get put in the spamtrap. For the rules-based filter, you must match a few rules. SpamAssassin is very effective - much better than using an RBL alone. Here's a few stats for my personal email address for how many spam emails I get per day: Sat Nov 29 01:00:43 UTC 2003 101 Sun Nov 30 01:00:51 UTC 2003 102 Mon Dec 1 01:00:35 UTC 2003 114 Tue Dec 2 01:00:45 UTC 2003 115 Wed Dec 3 01:00:11 UTC 2003 131 Thu Dec 4 01:00:09 UTC 2003 117 Fri Dec 5 01:00:09 UTC 2003 98 Sat Dec 6 01:00:10 UTC 2003 94 Sun Dec 7 01:01:14 UTC 2003 105 Mon Dec 8 01:00:13 UTC 2003 103 I get perhaps 3 or 4 actual emails from real people per day (excluding mailing lists). The scale of spam makes me wonder if email is really worth it any more, since I get two orders of magnitude more spam than ham. I have to waste time configuring SA, my server has to waste CPU cycles and disk space. Then there's worms/viruses. My mail server is configured to point-blank reject *all* Windows executables. During the recent Swen scourge, at one point Exim was rejecting several copies of the worm per minute. The mailserver literally had to reject gigabytes of Swen. Swen must have brought some smaller ISPs to their knees - I was just processing mail for a handful of users - just imagine the traffic for a couple of thousand users! Unfortunately, the MAPS RBL is not a solution - it's like a blunderbuss - it's fairly indiscriminate and inaccurate: many false positives and fairly ineffective blocking. I won't even use the MAPS RBL as a rule for SpamAssassin. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:59:30 -0000, Dylan Smith wrote:
The scale of spam makes me wonder if email is really worth it any more, since I get two orders of magnitude more spam than ham. For those wondering about the name 'SPAM': http://www.detritus.org/spam/skit.html and to come to an end on this thread: Jay, is your question somehow answered? *hehe* #m -- http://www.declareyourself.com/fyr_candidates.php http://www.subterrane.com/bush.shtml |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|