![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No problem with his being in the Air Guard. Too bad he didn't do it
honorably. -- Kevin McCue KRYN '47 Luscombe 8E Rans S-17 (for sale) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kevin McCue" wrote in message ... No problem with his being in the Air Guard. Too bad he didn't do it honorably. What do you find dishonorable about Guard service? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article et, Steven P.
McNicoll at wrote on 12/16/03 11:09 AM: "Kevin McCue" wrote in message ... No problem with his being in the Air Guard. Too bad he didn't do it honorably. What do you find dishonorable about Guard service? http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm The documents on this page aren't totally conclusive, but it would appear from the available evidence that Mr. Bush was AWOL. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm The documents on this page aren't totally conclusive, but it would appear from the available evidence that Mr. Bush was AWOL. So now I just have to sort through those documents to find support for your position? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... I really don't care what you do. Why do you look to me for direction? I'm not looking to you for direction. You said Bush's Guard service was not honorable, I asked you what you found dishonorable about it. Instead of answering you posted a web address. Actually, I don't really have a "position" in regards to this issue. I noticed it had been brought up, and a 10-second Google search found the above link. There's some interesting information there, for anyone with the initiative to spend a nanosecond or two on it. If you want to establish any credibility in these forums you have to support your own assertions. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... in article et, Steven P. McNicoll at wrote on 12/16/03 8:24 PM: "Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm The documents on this page aren't totally conclusive, but it would appear from the available evidence that Mr. Bush was AWOL. So now I just have to sort through those documents to find support for your position? I really don't care what you do. Why do you look to me for direction? Actually, I don't really have a "position" in regards to this issue. I noticed it had been brought up, and a 10-second Google search found the above link. There's some interesting information there, for anyone with the initiative to spend a nanosecond or two on it. Well, when you make a claim, it's up to you to support it. Further, it's up to you to find ALL RELEVANT information, including that info that refutes your position if it's available. In this case, such information IS available. So, now it's up to you; let's see how much of a mature man you really are. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 38 | November 19th 03 04:04 PM |