![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Rind ) wrote:
You have no hope of outclimbing a jet, and might want some additional airspeed if you hit a wake. Instead, I would have requested an early turnout and started my turn when I was 100' or 150' up. If they couldn't give me the early turnout, I would have refused the takeoff clearance. I'd be interested to know what others would do. My point of climbing at Vx was not to outclimb the DC9, which rotated about 7,000 feet down the runway. My point was to get above the obstacle DP altitude well before the DC9s rotation point, then turn the 90 degrees right that the tower had already approved. It's doubtful that the extra 10-15 knots of the C172's climb-out speed would make a bit of difference in an actual wake turbulence encounter. My plan was not to inadvertently encounter the wake, but rather to avoid it entirely. Hence, the plan to climb steeply then immediately turn away. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
My point of climbing at Vx was not to outclimb the DC9, which rotated about 7,000 feet down the runway. My point was to get above the obstacle DP altitude well before the DC9s rotation point, then turn the 90 degrees right that the tower had already approved. Were you in IMC such that the DP altitude mattered to you? I was picturing this happening in visual conditions where you could start maneuvering (as long as Logan permitted) much sooner. -- David Rind |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Rind wrote:
Were you in IMC such that the DP altitude mattered to you? I was picturing this happening in visual conditions where you could start maneuvering (as long as Logan permitted) much sooner. It was VMC but the tall control tower was close to my turnout heading and it was night time. We were departing 22 Right with a turnout to the west. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote in message ...
It was VMC but the tall control tower was close to my turnout heading and it was night time. We were departing 22 Right with a turnout to the west. When you get a legitimate opportunity to buzz the tower, take it! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter R. wrote: David Rind wrote: Were you in IMC such that the DP altitude mattered to you? I was picturing this happening in visual conditions where you could start maneuvering (as long as Logan permitted) much sooner. It was VMC but the tall control tower was close to my turnout heading and it was night time. We were departing 22 Right with a turnout to the west. It would be in character with Logan for them to assume that you had waved the wake caution unless you objected. Noting the 9's rotation point and positioning yourself above the wake until the turn is actually much better than delaying the 3 minutes. Any crosswind at all would clear your takeoff run of his jet blast. As we used to say, "You did good." -- Ron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|