![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky Scott wrote:
Ernest, I'm not sure I understand the problem. Most kits that require fiberglass supply the recommended type of resin. If you are doing something other than buiding a kit, you could just look at what the kits supply and use that, couldn't you? Why is this so difficult? Are you designing your own airplane? Thanks, Corky Scott Hey, Corky! I believe you were involved in the most informative thread I found as I was searching the archives of this group. Let me see if I can convey a least part of my confusion. The Dyke Delta JD-2 is a plans built craft...ie, no kit. The plans specify that the composite wing skins be laid up on a flat table and then wrapped and riveted to the stainless steel ribs before it is fully cured. I'm at work, so don't have the plans in front of me, but the instruction read something like: The prototype uses polyester vinyl resin. Other types of resins are available. Follow resin manufacturer's instructions. May not be the exact wording, but that is the gist of it. John Dyke has had a lot of problems over the years with the resin continuing to shrink, exposing the weave, etc. So I want to avoid those problems. That's the start of the confusion. Larry LaBeau just completed his Delta a year ago, and had a lot of success using premade panels. Hmmm...get a stronger, pin-hole free skin without all the work, smell, or exposure to hazardous chemicals. Great idea in my book. He bought his panels 6yrs ago. If you look at a manufactures web site, you'll be inundated with choices, all only slightly different. The thread I read here occured in 1994, and it discussed how brittle resins were and that some 'new' developments were making resins tougher vs just harder. It discussed how West Systems was not a good laminating epoxy, even though Aircraft Spruce sells it as a laminating epoxy. In fact, every place you look that sells epoxy says that every formulation is the perfect solution for everything. Just a lot of noise and practically no signal. I go to the EAA meeting and mention "resin system" and really get noise. If you try this, be ready to duck the flak from those supporting epoxy vs vinyl ester vs polyester vinyl vs chicken soup soaked paper napkins. I get the impression that very few know anything other than what their kit specified, and are arguing from the 'my choice must be the best, else I'm an idiot' perspective. I'd like to make these skins once, and not have a lot of regrets in 5yrs. I want to pick the BEST sytem, not just a good system. But as far as I can tell, the stuff that Lowe's has on its shelf is no different than the 'aircraft' epoxies, except in the lower price. I find VERY little difference in the mechanical properties of the different resins, but a LOT of difference in prices. Either I'm missing out on something, or a lot of people are getting taken for a ride. At this point, I'm assuming the former. Where can I find recent information other than sales brochures? More importantly, does it really matter? Is the stuff at Lowe's so much stronger than what's required that it just doesn't make sense to spend more? I forget who said it, but answers are easy. It's asking the right questions that's hard. Right now, I'm at the point of not even knowing if there is a good question to ask. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:37:51 GMT, Ernest Christley
wrote: Corky Scott wrote: Ernest, I'm not sure I understand the problem. Most kits that require fiberglass supply the recommended type of resin. If you are doing something other than buiding a kit, you could just look at what the kits supply and use that, couldn't you? Why is this so difficult? Are you designing your own airplane? Thanks, Corky Scott Hey, Corky! I believe you were involved in the most informative thread I found as I was searching the archives of this group. Let me see if I can convey a least part of my confusion. The Dyke Delta JD-2 is a plans built craft...ie, no kit. The plans specify that the composite wing skins be laid up on a flat table and then wrapped and riveted to the stainless steel ribs before it is fully cured. I'm at work, so don't have the plans in front of me, but the instruction read something like: The prototype uses polyester vinyl resin. Other types of resins are available. Follow resin manufacturer's instructions. May not be the exact wording, but that is the gist of it. John Dyke has had a lot of problems over the years with the resin continuing to shrink, exposing the weave, etc. So I want to avoid those problems. That's the start of the confusion. Ah, got it. The only suggestion I can make would be to speak to the folks who supply the plans materials and see what type of resin they are now offering. Perhaps it's different from the one originally called for by John Dyke. If that doesn't give you satisfaction, I think I'd speak to the manufacturers of the various resin systems and ask the opinion of the experts there. Explain what it is you are trying to do and why you are asking for their opinion. The covering process sounds complex: you have to allow the cloth to semi cure, and then lay it one such that it bonds in place. Man, that sounds like a narrow window. Saw one of those things zipping by at a Waco fly-in in Ohio back in '93 or so. It was FAST. Corky Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky Scott wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:37:51 GMT, Ernest Christley wrote: Corky Scott wrote: Ernest, I'm not sure I understand the problem. Most kits that require fiberglass supply the recommended type of resin. If you are doing something other than buiding a kit, you could just look at what the kits supply and use that, couldn't you? Why is this so difficult? Are you designing your own airplane? Thanks, Corky Scott Hey, Corky! I believe you were involved in the most informative thread I found as I was searching the archives of this group. Let me see if I can convey a least part of my confusion. The Dyke Delta JD-2 is a plans built craft...ie, no kit. The plans specify that the composite wing skins be laid up on a flat table and then wrapped and riveted to the stainless steel ribs before it is fully cured. I'm at work, so don't have the plans in front of me, but the instruction read something like: The prototype uses polyester vinyl resin. Other types of resins are available. Follow resin manufacturer's instructions. May not be the exact wording, but that is the gist of it. John Dyke has had a lot of problems over the years with the resin continuing to shrink, exposing the weave, etc. So I want to avoid those problems. That's the start of the confusion. Ah, got it. The only suggestion I can make would be to speak to the folks who supply the plans materials and see what type of resin they are now offering. Perhaps it's different from the one originally called for by John Dyke. If that doesn't give you satisfaction, I think I'd speak to the manufacturers of the various resin systems and ask the opinion of the experts there. Explain what it is you are trying to do and why you are asking for their opinion. The covering process sounds complex: you have to allow the cloth to semi cure, and then lay it one such that it bonds in place. Man, that sounds like a narrow window. Saw one of those things zipping by at a Waco fly-in in Ohio back in '93 or so. It was FAST. Corky Scott Back in "the old days", polyester resin was all that was really available. Not wanting to start the resin wars again, I'll only point out that JD used polyester resin for the Delta skins. But if he were designing this plane today? It would use epoxy resin. And foam cored composite structure - (instead of the welded/brazed steel structure) just the way he originally envisioned it. John was _way_ ahead of his time... Richard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Me thinks the 'panels' are riveted on semi-cured because in the good ol' days when resins cured they were brittle. These
are simply skins on the wing and they are not adhered via the resin; the resin is supposed to be slightly green to allow it to conform to the airfoil without cracking. Lay out the panels on a big piece of glass and it will be pin hole free when you pull it off. The panel can be trimmed to size while still on the glass. How many layers of what kind of glass are used in the lay-up? How sharp is the tightest bend? -- Dan D. .. "Corky Scott" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:37:51 GMT, Ernest Christley wrote: Corky Scott wrote: Ernest, I'm not sure I understand the problem. Most kits that require fiberglass supply the recommended type of resin. If you are doing something other than buiding a kit, you could just look at what the kits supply and use that, couldn't you? Why is this so difficult? Are you designing your own airplane? Thanks, Corky Scott Hey, Corky! I believe you were involved in the most informative thread I found as I was searching the archives of this group. Let me see if I can convey a least part of my confusion. The Dyke Delta JD-2 is a plans built craft...ie, no kit. The plans specify that the composite wing skins be laid up on a flat table and then wrapped and riveted to the stainless steel ribs before it is fully cured. I'm at work, so don't have the plans in front of me, but the instruction read something like: The prototype uses polyester vinyl resin. Other types of resins are available. Follow resin manufacturer's instructions. May not be the exact wording, but that is the gist of it. John Dyke has had a lot of problems over the years with the resin continuing to shrink, exposing the weave, etc. So I want to avoid those problems. That's the start of the confusion. Ah, got it. The only suggestion I can make would be to speak to the folks who supply the plans materials and see what type of resin they are now offering. Perhaps it's different from the one originally called for by John Dyke. If that doesn't give you satisfaction, I think I'd speak to the manufacturers of the various resin systems and ask the opinion of the experts there. Explain what it is you are trying to do and why you are asking for their opinion. The covering process sounds complex: you have to allow the cloth to semi cure, and then lay it one such that it bonds in place. Man, that sounds like a narrow window. Saw one of those things zipping by at a Waco fly-in in Ohio back in '93 or so. It was FAST. Corky Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blueskies wrote:
Me thinks the 'panels' are riveted on semi-cured because in the good ol' days when resins cured they were brittle. These are simply skins on the wing and they are not adhered via the resin; the resin is supposed to be slightly green to allow it to conform to the airfoil without cracking. Lay out the panels on a big piece of glass and it will be pin hole free when you pull it off. The panel can be trimmed to size while still on the glass. How many layers of what kind of glass are used in the lay-up? How sharp is the tightest bend? Wow. Big piece of glass. The skins will be a triangle with 8ft sides. The plans specify two layers of 7.5 or 10oz glass. They extend up to the 1" radius of the leading edge, but don't actually go around it. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I guess that would be a big piece of glass (don't take anything out of context here!). Do the plans/instructions
have any other suggested way to lay up the panels? As far as bending the finished panels, a two layer lay-up will be quite flexible, even fully cured, and as long as you don't have to wrap around the LE I'm sure you will not have any problems with cracking. Have you looked at the http://www.westsystem.com/ site? Good stuff... -- Dan D. .. "Ernest Christley" wrote in message om... Blueskies wrote: Me thinks the 'panels' are riveted on semi-cured because in the good ol' days when resins cured they were brittle. These are simply skins on the wing and they are not adhered via the resin; the resin is supposed to be slightly green to allow it to conform to the airfoil without cracking. Lay out the panels on a big piece of glass and it will be pin hole free when you pull it off. The panel can be trimmed to size while still on the glass. How many layers of what kind of glass are used in the lay-up? How sharp is the tightest bend? Wow. Big piece of glass. The skins will be a triangle with 8ft sides. The plans specify two layers of 7.5 or 10oz glass. They extend up to the 1" radius of the leading edge, but don't actually go around it. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blueskies wrote:
Yes, I guess that would be a big piece of glass (don't take anything out of context here!). Do the plans/instructions have any other suggested way to lay up the panels? As far as bending the finished panels, a two layer lay-up will be quite flexible, even fully cured, and as long as you don't have to wrap around the LE I'm sure you will not have any problems with cracking. Have you looked at the http://www.westsystem.com/ site? Good stuff... -- Dan D. . I've been told that West does indeed make a laminating resin, but this isn't it. West 105/205 is absolute best stuff I've ever used - on wood. It will probably be great on wood/foam structures. But it's not what I ever use (again) for laminating glass fabrics. I used to use Dow 330 / 147(?) but my source quit carrying it (because I was the only one buying it?) My impression is that resins like 330 that don't use MDA (Methyl Diethel Amines???) share a common "problem". At low temperatures they tend to "separate out". The resin has an odd lumpy look on the surface and there will be a lump of soft rock candy in the center. It is real simple to correct by immersing the resin container in hot water for a while. When the soup is clear again, it's ready to use. But if the resin is at all "crystallized", it won't completely set - ever. It even says so in the directions! For those who read such things... Got AeroPoxy(?) last resupply to make a new cowling for Leo's Super Zodiac. I've used it before, no complaints (other than the MDA toxicity?). So, what is it that you are building? Richard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
Blueskies wrote: Yes, I guess that would be a big piece of glass (don't take anything out of context here!). Do the plans/instructions have any other suggested way to lay up the panels? As far as bending the finished panels, a two layer lay-up will be quite flexible, even fully cured, and as long as you don't have to wrap around the LE I'm sure you will not have any problems with cracking. Have you looked at the http://www.westsystem.com/ site? Good stuff... -- Dan D. . I've been told that West does indeed make a laminating resin, but this isn't it. West 105/205 is absolute best stuff I've ever used - on wood. It will probably be great on wood/foam structures. But it's not what I ever use (again) for laminating glass fabrics. I used to use Dow 330 / 147(?) but my source quit carrying it (because I was the only one buying it?) My impression is that resins like 330 that don't use MDA (Methyl Diethel Amines???) share a common "problem". At low temperatures they tend to "separate out". The resin has an odd lumpy look on the surface and there will be a lump of soft rock candy in the center. It is real simple to correct by immersing the resin container in hot water for a while. When the soup is clear again, it's ready to use. But if the resin is at all "crystallized", it won't completely set - ever. It even says so in the directions! For those who read such things... Got AeroPoxy(?) last resupply to make a new cowling for Leo's Super Zodiac. I've used it before, no complaints (other than the MDA toxicity?). So, what is it that you are building? Richard Dyke Delta JD-2. http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org for the whole story. The skins, turtleback and cowling are all fiberglass. Some builders have also glassed the belly, tailfin and control surfaces (plans call for fabric there). -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blueskies wrote:
Yes, I guess that would be a big piece of glass (don't take anything out of context here!). Do the plans/instructions have any other suggested way to lay up the panels? The directions say to lay it up on a couple pieces of MDF laid side-to-side, with a piece of tape down the center. I have to cut forms for the stainless steel ribs, so I thought an improvement on this technique might be to use the forms to shape the MDF so that the resulting layup is nearly the correct shape already. Very little bending==very little built up stress. The biggest improvement would be not to have to make the skins at all. I've looked at G-10 and FR4, and have found several manufactures with lots of data sheets. Reading them, I keep hearing that eerie refrain, "You are in a maze of rooms, all slightly different..." As far as bending the finished panels, a two layer lay-up will be quite flexible, even fully cured, and as long as you don't have to wrap around the LE I'm sure you will not have any problems with cracking. Have you looked at the http://www.westsystem.com/ site? Good stuff... Looked there. Good stuff...IF you're building a boat, or a trailer, or a chair. Goes back to what I said before. Every manufacturers claim that what they have is good for whatever you're doing. While that just may be true, but I don't trust it to be, and it is so much unfamiliar territory that I just keep getting lost. What I need is a map to help seperate the hype from the information. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:37:51 GMT, Ernest Christley
wrote: :In fact, every place you look that sells epoxy says that every :formulation is the perfect solution for everything. Just a lot of noise :and practically no signal. I go to the EAA meeting and mention "resin :system" and really get noise. If you try this, be ready to duck the :flak from those supporting epoxy vs vinyl ester vs polyester vinyl vs :chicken soup soaked paper napkins. I get the impression that very few :know anything other than what their kit specified, and are arguing from :the 'my choice must be the best, else I'm an idiot' perspective. Talk to Gary Hunter, of Gary Hunter Composites in Houston, Texas. The last email I have for him is gluegaru (at) earth (dot) net. Another one I have is gary (dot) hunter (at) resins (dot) com but that one is older and my not be good anymore. Do the obvious replacements to despamify. "Gary is an Epoxy Resin Chemist for Shell Chemical Company, with over 26 years experience formulating and using epoxies in various end uses throughout the industry." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Vacuum Baggin vs. Resin Infusion | Steve | Home Built | 0 | August 21st 03 05:25 AM |
Fiberglass Vacuum Bagging Technique...Resin Infusion | Steve | Home Built | 5 | August 8th 03 06:10 PM |
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster | Morgans | Home Built | 3 | August 6th 03 04:46 AM |