A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Catastrophic Decompression; Small Place Solo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 31st 03, 05:08 AM
Jeff Franks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


If a window blows out, everything that is not tied down will certainly be
sucked out, and this could include people if they were small enough.


Its my understanding that in an explosive decompression like this, the
decompression will happen very fast. The Goldfinger episode goes on for 45
minutes of hanging on for dear life while the plane depressurizes. My
un-educated guess is that this would happen in seconds or less.


  #2  
Old December 31st 03, 07:03 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Franks" wrote in message
...

If a window blows out, everything that is not tied down will certainly

be
sucked out, and this could include people if they were small enough.


Its my understanding that in an explosive decompression like this, the
decompression will happen very fast. The Goldfinger episode goes on for

45
minutes of hanging on for dear life while the plane depressurizes. My
un-educated guess is that this would happen in seconds or less.

Witnessed the result of "Port Hole Window" on the starboard side of a C-5
blowing out during "Initial Factory Pressure checks" on a new C-5". The
window itself went through the side of a "Tin Sided Building" ~ 200' from
where the window/port hole came from. A substantial number of the
insulation/batting blankets were torn from their normal place in the cargo
bay & piled on the cargo bay floor near the opening. A large number of the
insulation blankets/bats, along with seat cushions from the upper aft troop
compartment were piled around the entrance to the stairs from the troop
compartment down to the cargo bay, plus scattered along the cargo bay floor
in the direction of the failed port hole/window. Seat cushions, mattresses
from bunks, & insulation bats/blankets from the upper front area were piled
against the exit stairs from the upper from lobe & along the cargo bay floor
toward the failed port hole/window. A few of the insulation bats/blankets
were blown out the failed port hole/window.

A/C being tested were instrumented to record/document test protocols as
appropriate. According to instrumentation on the A/C, at time of port
hole/window failure the air pressure dropped from 14.5 lbs to 0 in .003
seconds.

Factory Pressure Check on C-5's was 15 pounds, slightly over 1 atmosphere.
This was worked up to in stages. This incident occurred.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #3  
Old December 31st 03, 04:51 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
m...

"Jeff Franks" wrote in message
...


Witnessed the result of "Port Hole Window" on the starboard side of a C-5
blowing out during "Initial Factory Pressure checks" on a new C-5". The
window itself went through the side of a "Tin Sided Building" ~ 200' from
where the window/port hole came from. A substantial number of the
insulation/batting blankets were torn from their normal place in the cargo
bay & piled on the cargo bay floor near the opening. A large number of the
insulation blankets/bats, along with seat cushions from the upper aft

troop
compartment were piled around the entrance to the stairs from the troop
compartment down to the cargo bay, plus scattered along the cargo bay

floor
in the direction of the failed port hole/window. Seat cushions, mattresses
from bunks, & insulation bats/blankets from the upper front area were

piled
against the exit stairs from the upper from lobe & along the cargo bay

floor
toward the failed port hole/window. A few of the insulation bats/blankets
were blown out the failed port hole/window.

A/C being tested were instrumented to record/document test protocols as
appropriate. According to instrumentation on the A/C, at time of port
hole/window failure the air pressure dropped from 14.5 lbs to 0 in .003
seconds.

Factory Pressure Check on C-5's was 15 pounds, slightly over 1 atmosphere.
This was worked up to in stages. This incident occurred.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


This is not the same situation. First the preasurization was set to twice
what it will be in flight. Second the preasure dropped because the engines
were not pumping air in. Take a bicycle tire pump it up to 8psi (almost
flat) and then let the air out. This it the same preasure differential.

Mike
MU-2





  #4  
Old December 31st 03, 06:34 PM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
link.net...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
m...

"Jeff Franks" wrote in message
...


Witnessed the result of "Port Hole Window" on the starboard side of a

C-5
blowing out during "Initial Factory Pressure checks" on a new C-5". The
window itself went through the side of a "Tin Sided Building" ~ 200'

from
where the window/port hole came from. A substantial number of the
insulation/batting blankets were torn from their normal place in the

cargo
bay & piled on the cargo bay floor near the opening. A large number of

the
insulation blankets/bats, along with seat cushions from the upper aft

troop
compartment were piled around the entrance to the stairs from the troop
compartment down to the cargo bay, plus scattered along the cargo bay

floor
in the direction of the failed port hole/window. Seat cushions,

mattresses
from bunks, & insulation bats/blankets from the upper front area were

piled
against the exit stairs from the upper from lobe & along the cargo bay

floor
toward the failed port hole/window. A few of the insulation

bats/blankets
were blown out the failed port hole/window.

A/C being tested were instrumented to record/document test protocols as
appropriate. According to instrumentation on the A/C, at time of port
hole/window failure the air pressure dropped from 14.5 lbs to 0 in .003
seconds.

Factory Pressure Check on C-5's was 15 pounds, slightly over 1

atmosphere.
This was worked up to in stages. This incident occurred.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


This is not the same situation. First the preasurization was set to twice
what it will be in flight. Second the preasure dropped because the

engines
were not pumping air in. Take a bicycle tire pump it up to 8psi (almost
flat) and then let the air out. This it the same preasure differential.

Mike
MU-2

Agreed.

The purpose of the pressure test in question is to assure structural
pressure integrity to 1 atmosphere above AGSL.

Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this is
an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of ambient.
When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is
above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure.

A/C pressure systems are set to operate from departure point. If set
manually from info provided by ATC this is "Unadjusted Barometric Presser"
read from an instrument at the base of the Tower, a specified height above
the ramp. Most modern commercial A/C are equipped with automatic systems
that capture relevant data upon command/that is reset for each flight.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #5  
Old December 31st 03, 08:17 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
m...
Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this is
an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of ambient.
When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is
above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure.

This is incorrect, pressurization is the differential between ambient and
cabin preasure.

Mike
MU-2

A/C pressure systems are set to operate from departure point. If set
manually from info provided by ATC this is "Unadjusted Barometric Presser"
read from an instrument at the base of the Tower, a specified height above
the ramp. Most modern commercial A/C are equipped with automatic systems
that capture relevant data upon command/that is reset for each flight.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type




  #6  
Old January 1st 04, 05:35 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
m...
Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this

is
an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of

ambient.
When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is
above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure.

This is incorrect, pressurization is the differential between ambient and
cabin preasure.

Mike
MU-2

Please reconsider your statement above as it applies to pressurization of
A/C cabins at altitude.

At altitude A/C cabins are like a pressure vessel. A/C cabins are
pressurized to maintain ~ 12 PSI Gauge, ~ the same as normal atmospheric
pressure @ 11,000' ASL, in the cabin irrespective of altitude above 11,000'
ASL.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type

A/C pressure systems are set to operate from departure point. If set
manually from info provided by ATC this is "Unadjusted Barometric

Presser"
read from an instrument at the base of the Tower, a specified height

above
the ramp. Most modern commercial A/C are equipped with automatic systems
that capture relevant data upon command/that is reset for each flight.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type






  #7  
Old January 1st 04, 06:59 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message gy.com...


At altitude A/C cabins are like a pressure vessel. A/C cabins are
pressurized to maintain ~ 12 PSI Gauge, ~ the same as normal atmospheric
pressure @ 11,000' ASL, in the cabin irrespective of altitude above 11,000'


Actually, 8,000' (at least in US certificated transports).

  #8  
Old January 2nd 04, 06:14 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
gy.com...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
m...
Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude

this
is
an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of

ambient.
When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading

is
above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure.

This is incorrect, pressurization is the differential between ambient

and
cabin preasure.

Mike
MU-2

Please reconsider your statement above as it applies to pressurization of
A/C cabins at altitude.

At altitude A/C cabins are like a pressure vessel. A/C cabins are
pressurized to maintain ~ 12 PSI Gauge, ~ the same as normal atmospheric
pressure @ 11,000' ASL, in the cabin irrespective of altitude above

11,000'
ASL.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


No, the cabin is not at a constant preasure above 11,000' (and the number
that you are looking for is 8,000') unless the rate controller is set to a
rate greater than the climb rate of the aircraft (which is never done). If
what you say were true then the cabin altitude would not climb with the
airplane above 11,000' (8,000') which it clearly does. If you doubt this,
go buy an altimeter watch and see for yourself. Or you could buy a
pressurized airplane.

Mike
MU-2


  #9  
Old December 31st 03, 08:31 PM
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote

Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this is
an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of ambient.
When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is
above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure.


In the Boeing aircraft that I flew (B-727,B-707,B-720) there were two
gages on the FE's panel. One was a simple altimeter that indicated the
cabin altitude at all times and the other, a differential pressure gage
that indicated the difference in pressure between outside and inside.
The maximum differential for those aircraft was around 8.6 psi. The only
way to determine the absolute pressure inside the aircraft would be to use
a graph to convert the altimeter indication to pressure.

Bob Moore
  #10  
Old January 1st 04, 05:43 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert Moore" wrote in message
...
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote

Hopefully all realize when referring to "Air Pressure" at altitude this

is
an "absolute" pressure value inside the fuselage irrespective of

ambient.
When referring to air pressures at ground level the pressure reading is
above unadjusted ambient barometric pressure.


In the Boeing aircraft that I flew (B-727,B-707,B-720) there were two
gages on the FE's panel. One was a simple altimeter that indicated the
cabin altitude at all times and the other, a differential pressure gage
that indicated the difference in pressure between outside and inside.
The maximum differential for those aircraft was around 8.6 psi. The only
way to determine the absolute pressure inside the aircraft would be to use
a graph to convert the altimeter indication to pressure.

Bob Moore

The protocols you reiterate above will translate to a ~ constant pressure of
12 PSI Gauge inside the cabin as the A/C moves through it's flight profile
above ~ 11,000'.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 10th 04 12:35 AM
Order your FREE Small Blue Planet Toys Christmas Catalog before Oct 20th! Small Blue Planet Toys Aviation Marketplace 0 October 15th 03 06:26 PM
Invest small Earn Large ($20 000+) promethean General Aviation 0 October 3rd 03 07:08 AM
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble Small Blue Planet Toys Aviation Marketplace 0 July 11th 03 05:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.