Capt. Al Haynes sorta OT.

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:39:13 GMT, Jonathan Goodish wrote:

[take it from the not so rich and make the rich even richer]
As you demonstrate,
though, our generousity is often not appreciated by those from other
countries.

Yes, your generous bombs are not appreciated.

#m


AND NOW HONOR THE FOLLOW UP 2 POSTER!
--
harsh regulations in North Korea (read below link after reading the story):
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/04/open-mikulan.php
oooops ... sorry ... it happened in the USA, ya know: the land of the free.

Yeah, GOOD ANSWER man!

Jeez...

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message

Yes, your generous bombs are not appreciated.

#m




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:44:56 +0000, Martin Hotze wrote:

Yes, your generous bombs are not appreciated.

You are the most disagreeable person I have ever had the displeasure to read
on Usenet. Here we have a person trying to do a good thing and all you
can do is bitch about it and call names.

I suppose in your country everybody has their every need catered to at no
charge to them? Nobody has ever gone hungry, without medicine, prompt
care, no beggars, no thieves, it's a utopia for every single citizen
there?

I bet not one crime is ever committed there since everyone has every need
met, or so you would have us believe.

Get real, charity is a good thing, and many here help out.

If you look up Martin's past posts, they are almost exclusively off-topic.
His posts rarely add any value.

The guy's a borderline (Austrian) troll





"Matthew P. Cummings" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:44:56 +0000, Martin Hotze wrote:

Yes, your generous bombs are not appreciated.

You are the most disagreeable person I have ever had the displeasure to
read
on Usenet. Here we have a person trying to do a good thing and all you
can do is bitch about it and call names.

I suppose in your country everybody has their every need catered to at no
charge to them? Nobody has ever gone hungry, without medicine, prompt
care, no beggars, no thieves, it's a utopia for every single citizen
there?

I bet not one crime is ever committed there since everyone has every need
met, or so you would have us believe.

Get real, charity is a good thing, and many here help out.




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

In article ,
"Marco Leon" mleon(at)optonline.net wrote:
If you look up Martin's past posts, they are almost exclusively off-topic.
His posts rarely add any value.

The guy's a borderline (Austrian) troll

Well, at least he's honest about not appreciating the fact that the
United States and others are actively working to protect civilization
from terrorists. Can't fault the guy for being honest.


JKG

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:11:55 GMT, Jonathan Goodish wrote:

Well, at least he's honest about not appreciating the fact that the
United States and others are actively working to protect civilization
from terrorists.

USA are only working on forcing their lifestyle on everybody else
everywhere in the world and pulling/sucking out their interests. Who is a
terrorist? And what with all those who are not "with you"?

I don't like the US-lifestyle. I prefer a even _more_ civilized lifestyle.

Can't fault the guy for being honest.

My tip: get a passport. travel. with open eyes.

#m

--
harsh regulations in North Korea (read below link after reading the story):
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/04/open-mikulan.php
oooops ... sorry ... it happened in the USA, ya know: the land of the free.

You are the most disagreeable person I have ever had the displeasure to read
on Usenet.

What have you been on the Internet for, two weeks? Sheesh, what a weenie.
Martin's a delightful individual with an original sense of humor and a mastery
of this language that puts many native posters to shame. To take offense is to
prove yourself thin-skinned, unperceptive and unreasonable.

On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:42:13 +0000, StellaStar wrote:

What have you been on the Internet for, two weeks? Sheesh, what a weenie.
Martin's a delightful individual with an original sense of humor and a mastery

As to being around a couple weeks, what a laugh. I've been around since
before it was commercialized and IMO Usenet was a better place then
because you had real answers, not the drivel Martin spews. If you went to
a newsgroup on aviation that's what you found, not this propaganda Martin
spews. When I started reading Usenet the only way to get it was by a UUCP
connection, so I have been here for more than a couple weeks. I lurk more
than I post, but I do post once in a while.

I have yet to see a posting from him describing his flights, or places
he's gone flying at, or kids he's taken up. Does he even fly a plane, or
is he just out there flying high?

What "positive" thing has he done for either pilots here, or aviation in
general? Why does he even post in the aviation newsgroups when he refuses
to talk aviation? Why doesn't he just drop in on the soc.* groups and
harass them? His postings are more on topic there than here.

In the end, I've got a cold and he just pushed the wrong buttons and I
vented. You can only take Martin in small doses.

For a positive comment about him, he does post references for many of his
more down to Earth claims.

I would like to challenge Martin to post only about Aviation with no
political undertones for one week. I bet he can't do it.

What "positive" thing has he done for either pilots here, or aviation in
general? Why does he even post in the aviation newsgroups when he refuses
to talk aviation? Why doesn't he just drop in on the soc.* groups and
harass them? His postings are more on topic there than here.

I believe Marty has admitted to never owning an aircraft. And I've never
seen him post about here flying per se.

I, too, would like to know why he posts on an aviation newsgroup. I've
never seen him start an on-topic thread yet. It's one thing to allow
thread-drift to carry you off-topic -- it's another thing entirely to NEVER
talk about flying.

Personally, I think he's really a 14 year old wannabe, with a 6th-grade
command of English.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"
"Matthew P. Cummings" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:42:13 +0000, StellaStar wrote:

What have you been on the Internet for, two weeks? Sheesh, what a
weenie.
Martin's a delightful individual with an original sense of humor and a
mastery

As to being around a couple weeks, what a laugh. I've been around since
before it was commercialized and IMO Usenet was a better place then
because you had real answers, not the drivel Martin spews. If you went to
a newsgroup on aviation that's what you found, not this propaganda Martin
spews. When I started reading Usenet the only way to get it was by a UUCP
connection, so I have been here for more than a couple weeks. I lurk more
than I post, but I do post once in a while.

I have yet to see a posting from him describing his flights, or places
he's gone flying at, or kids he's taken up. Does he even fly a plane, or
is he just out there flying high?


In the end, I've got a cold and he just pushed the wrong buttons and I
vented. You can only take Martin in small doses.

For a positive comment about him, he does post references for many of his
more down to Earth claims.

I would like to challenge Martin to post only about Aviation with no
political undertones for one week. I bet he can't do it.

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:392Jb.35641$xX.117755@attbi_s02...
What "positive" thing has he done for either pilots here, or aviation in
general? Why does he even post in the aviation newsgroups when he
refuses
to talk aviation? Why doesn't he just drop in on the soc.* groups and
harass them? His postings are more on topic there than here.

I believe Marty has admitted to never owning an aircraft. And I've never
seen him post about here flying per se.

I, too, would like to know why he posts on an aviation newsgroup. I've
never seen him start an on-topic thread yet. It's one thing to allow
thread-drift to carry you off-topic -- it's another thing entirely to
NEVER
talk about flying.

I'd say you don't always make your postings on topic either... Some are,
some aren't, and many are superficially related to aviation.



Personally, I think he's really a 14 year old wannabe, with a 6th-grade
command of English.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"
"Matthew P. Cummings" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:42:13 +0000, StellaStar wrote:

What have you been on the Internet for, two weeks? Sheesh, what a
weenie.
Martin's a delightful individual with an original sense of humor and a
mastery

As to being around a couple weeks, what a laugh. I've been around since
before it was commercialized and IMO Usenet was a better place then
because you had real answers, not the drivel Martin spews. If you went
to
a newsgroup on aviation that's what you found, not this propaganda
Martin
spews. When I started reading Usenet the only way to get it was by a
UUCP
connection, so I have been here for more than a couple weeks. I lurk
more
than I post, but I do post once in a while.

I have yet to see a posting from him describing his flights, or places
he's gone flying at, or kids he's taken up. Does he even fly a plane,
or
is he just out there flying high?


In the end, I've got a cold and he just pushed the wrong buttons and I
vented. You can only take Martin in small doses.

For a positive comment about him, he does post references for many of
his
more down to Earth claims.

I would like to challenge Martin to post only about Aviation with no
political undertones for one week. I bet he can't do it.