![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... He also has an obligation to get as much information about the flight as he can. If the "intelligence" services have such information he should be provided with it. Likewise if the are FAMs on board he should know. Why? as the Commander he is legally responsible for what goes on with his flight. So if his aircraft is hijacked the commander is responsible? If the Feds can pick an choose when a commander is the commander and when he is not, where does that leave all pilots? The Feds are not doing that. The FARs make it very clear whose in charge. Show me where they have changed it. They haven't. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Riley" wrote in message ... Uhh, yeah, they do. They're the ones that are flying without a ticket, without going through security, that aren't on the manifest, that aren't included in the final head count, that don't have to buckle their seatbelts on takeoff and landing, that have sat-enabled com that they can use during flight? Not to mention the pistols that might get accidentally seen and cause the FAs to panic if they didn't know it was one of the good guys? Why wouldn't a marshal be included in the head count, or be on the manifest, even if under an alias, or wear a seatbelt , etc.? Why would the need "sat-enabled com that they can use during flight?" |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Jan1.html http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...908945226.html Note that this fellow was supposedly on duty at the time. Also note that this took under a minute to research (a search on news.google.com for "tsa drunk"). The Age cite states, "It was not clear whether Brady was supposed to have been on duty when he was arrested by a Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority police officer." |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Davis" wrote in message ... Your understanding is incorrect. The entire crew knows who and where the FAMs are Seems counterproductive to me. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Davis" wrote in message ... It should tell you that as a crew member for a major airline I am qualified to answer the question regarding the crew's knowledge of FAMs riding aboard our aircraft. But how does "Jack Davis B-737" indicate that you're a crew member for a major airline? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
But what about the emergency exits? At cruise altitude with normal pressurization (8-9 psi), there would be 2-3 tons of force holding the average emergency exit in place. Bob Moore |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Moore" wrote in message . 7... At cruise altitude with normal pressurization (8-9 psi), there would be 2-3 tons of force holding the average emergency exit in place. Is there a procedure for a mishap that leaves the cabin at a higher pressure than the outside atmosphere? |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
Is there a procedure for a mishap that leaves the cabin at a higher pressure than the outside atmosphere? Well...the flightcrew can switch from automatic to manual on the pressurization controller and then manually open the outflow valves .....very slowly. Bob Moore |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message hlink.net... Do the sky marshals guard every emergency exit? What would happen if a terrorist opened and emergency hatch at 36,000 ft? Can they be opened at all when the plane is at altitude? Well, if they can be opened at altitude, the terrorist would be the first to depart. So what would his purpose be in opening one? You don't think the 9/11 hijackers weren't willing to die for the cause? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 20:39:46 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: But how does "Jack Davis B-737" indicate that you're a crew member for a major airline? How many different types of corporate entities operate 737s? I would think it would be obvious that the chances are pretty good (although not 100%, admittedly) that a 737 pilot would work for an airline and would know the answer to the original post in question. -J Jack Davis B-737 -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GNS 480 means no GNS 430 upgrade ? | Scott Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | September 4th 04 04:05 AM |
"Comrade's casualty abroad means grim duty at home" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | June 1st 04 09:21 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Air Vice Marshal Tony Dudgeon | Keith Willshaw | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 12:43 PM |
"Stand Alone" Boxes (Garmin 430) - Sole means of navigation - legal? | Richard | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | September 30th 03 02:13 PM |