A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What having a sky marshal really means



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 7th 04, 10:10 PM
Jack Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 20:33:57 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

Seems counterproductive to me.


How is the flight crew's knowledge of the location and identities of
FAMs "counterproductive"?

-J

Jack Davis
B-737


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2  
Old January 7th 04, 10:16 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack Davis" wrote in message
...

How is the flight crew's knowledge of the location and identities of
FAMs "counterproductive"?


Such knowledge would make it possible for them to identify the marshal to a
terrorist.


  #3  
Old January 7th 04, 10:24 PM
Jack Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:16:25 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

Such knowledge would make it possible for them to identify the marshal to a
terrorist.


Why would we do that? The FAM will make his own "introduction" to the
terrorist long before we could get involved!

-J

Jack Davis
B-737


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #4  
Old January 7th 04, 10:28 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack Davis" wrote in message
...

Why would we do that?


It does not have to be intentional.



The FAM will make his own "introduction" to the
terrorist long before we could get involved!


The terrorist might choose to get you involved as his first order of
business.


  #5  
Old January 7th 04, 10:42 PM
Jack Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:28:47 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

The terrorist might choose to get you involved as his first order of
business


Since I'll be locked behind the "Taliban door" he'll never get the
chance to get me involved.

If there is any kind of serious altercation between a terrorist and a
Flight Attendant, the FAM will, as I said earlier, make his own
introductions.

-J

Jack Davis
B-737


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #6  
Old January 7th 04, 10:51 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack Davis" wrote in message
...

If there is any kind of serious altercation between a terrorist and a
Flight Attendant, the FAM will, as I said earlier, make his own
introductions.


The purpose of an altercation between a terrorist and a flight attendant may
be for the purpose of identifying the marshal to the terrorist by the flight
attendant. It's better if the flight crew doesn't know who the marshal is
or even if one is aboard.


  #7  
Old January 7th 04, 11:15 PM
Jack Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:51:17 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

The purpose of an altercation between a terrorist and a flight attendant may
be for the purpose of identifying the marshal to the terrorist by the flight
attendant. It's better if the flight crew doesn't know who the marshal is
or even if one is aboard.


No, it isn't better for us to be in the dark. If things go to hell it
would be best if we knew who was on our side, especially considering
that some pilots are now carrying as well. It is also for this reason
that the crews need to know the identities and locations of other law
enforcement types as well.

Second, there have already been several cases where the cover of on
board FAMs have been compromised and in none of those case has the
flight crew been implicated or even involved. As is usually the case,
the well-trained and professional FAMs have secured the situation long
before the crews even knew what was happening.

-J

Jack Davis
B-737


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GNS 480 means no GNS 430 upgrade ? Scott Moore Instrument Flight Rules 17 September 4th 04 04:05 AM
"Comrade's casualty abroad means grim duty at home" Mike Military Aviation 0 June 1st 04 09:21 PM
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Air Vice Marshal Tony Dudgeon Keith Willshaw Military Aviation 0 January 9th 04 12:43 PM
"Stand Alone" Boxes (Garmin 430) - Sole means of navigation - legal? Richard Instrument Flight Rules 20 September 30th 03 02:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.